* bug#17069: 24.4.50; HAVE_GLIB is not defined when gfilenotify is the only user
@ 2014-03-23 8:58 YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2014-03-23 9:24 ` bug#17069: Fixed Daniel Colascione
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu @ 2014-03-23 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 17069
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install glib.
2. ./configure --with-x-toolkit=athena --without-rsvg
Result:
In src/config.h, HAVE_GFILENOTIFY is defined, but not for HAVE_GLIB.
(I guess the latter is necessary for proper gfilenotify support.)
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp
In GNU Emacs 24.4.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw scroll bars)
of 2014-03-23 on ubuntu
Repository revision: 116853 dancol@dancol.org-20140323060236-dtlsz33veq7asjfb
Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11103000
System Description: Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
Configured using:
`configure --with-x-toolkit=athena --without-rsvg'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#17069: Fixed
2014-03-23 8:58 bug#17069: 24.4.50; HAVE_GLIB is not defined when gfilenotify is the only user YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
@ 2014-03-23 9:24 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-03-23 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Colascione @ 2014-03-23 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 17069-done
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 28 bytes --]
Fixed in trust r116856..
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#17069: Fixed
2014-03-23 9:24 ` bug#17069: Fixed Daniel Colascione
@ 2014-03-23 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-23 18:34 ` Glenn Morris
2014-03-25 15:59 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2014-03-23 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Colascione; +Cc: 17069
> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:32 -0700
> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
>
> Fixed in trust r116856..
Thanks, but why on the trunk? The same problem exists on the release
branch, no?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#17069: Fixed
2014-03-23 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2014-03-23 18:34 ` Glenn Morris
2014-03-23 18:49 ` Juanma Barranquero
2014-03-25 15:59 ` Glenn Morris
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2014-03-23 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 17069
In any case, can I again prod people to put
Version: 24.5
(or whatever) at the start of their -done messages.
Because otherwise when someone looks at
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=17069
a year from now, they have a hard time figuring out which Emacs release
the fix is supposed to be in.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#17069: Fixed
2014-03-23 18:34 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2014-03-23 18:49 ` Juanma Barranquero
2014-03-23 23:24 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2014-03-23 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: 17069
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
> In any case, can I again prod people to put
>
> Version: 24.5
>
> (or whatever) at the start of their -done messages.
Does that work in all -done messages (I mean, not Bcc:ed to
control@debbugs.org)?
I'm asking because AFAICS, admin/notes/bugtracker only mentions
Version: in the context of reporting new bugs. Elsewhere it refers to
the "fixed BUGNO VERSION" control syntax, not pseudo-headers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#17069: Fixed
2014-03-23 18:49 ` Juanma Barranquero
@ 2014-03-23 23:24 ` Glenn Morris
2014-03-23 23:27 ` Juanma Barranquero
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2014-03-23 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juanma Barranquero; +Cc: 17069
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> In any case, can I again prod people to put
>>
>> Version: 24.5
>>
>> (or whatever) at the start of their -done messages.
>
> Does that work in all -done messages (I mean, not Bcc:ed to
> control@debbugs.org)?
Yes. In fact, only in such messages.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#17069: Fixed
2014-03-23 23:24 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2014-03-23 23:27 ` Juanma Barranquero
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juanma Barranquero @ 2014-03-23 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: 17069
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
> Yes. In fact, only in such messages.
Good to know, thanks.
I'd suggest adding that info to admin/notes/bugtracker, BTW.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#17069: Fixed
2014-03-23 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-23 18:34 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2014-03-25 15:59 ` Glenn Morris
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2014-03-25 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 17069
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 02:24:32 -0700
>> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
>>
>> Fixed in trust r116856..
>
> Thanks, but why on the trunk? The same problem exists on the release
> branch, no?
I also think this should be in emacs-24.
Please could someone backport it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-25 15:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-23 8:58 bug#17069: 24.4.50; HAVE_GLIB is not defined when gfilenotify is the only user YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2014-03-23 9:24 ` bug#17069: Fixed Daniel Colascione
2014-03-23 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-23 18:34 ` Glenn Morris
2014-03-23 18:49 ` Juanma Barranquero
2014-03-23 23:24 ` Glenn Morris
2014-03-23 23:27 ` Juanma Barranquero
2014-03-25 15:59 ` Glenn Morris
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).