From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 20:43:25 +0100 Message-ID: <5314DB5D.50709@gmx.at> References: <53143D5C.7020000@gmx.at> <5314CBE1.6050905@gmx.at> <04dda5ae-8b70-42f5-ae09-c1d05ebc9297@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393875857 23286 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2014 19:44:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16923@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 03 20:44:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYmk-0002ib-80 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 20:44:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41457 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYmj-0003UE-Qb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYmY-0003T7-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:44:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYmQ-0004DR-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYmQ-0004DI-Na for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYmQ-0003jL-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16923 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16923-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16923.139387582014289 (code B ref 16923); Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16923) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2014 19:43:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49423 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYm3-0003iO-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:58351) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYm0-0003iG-V4 for 16923@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [178.190.164.27] ([178.190.164.27]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M9eHT-1WVJKz43Pr-00Cxrh for <16923@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 20:43:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <04dda5ae-8b70-42f5-ae09-c1d05ebc9297@default> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:G4TTr5j/9I3MHcSKi3aChEkaEsOYqK38/7UKPdvIcL+66VMB12B UyvaiVC/eZ1AzL/wMqSQ2DKT5ljs25q9+8S2Uk2IXjWI2zZvCFTNbePc6NMBf/0aBqdyycL GWuhaT0acyMjoQeje5LncIPIWdJA/hARHVGuxTWitJQHtEGXbFxOOul7jRhlKz8nyazN4Vz 5C93RQZcDugPsGAsvgCLA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86508 Archived-At: >> > So it seems that with the code after 2013-12-14 a nil value has >> > the same effect as a non-nil value (?). >> >> No. The only difference is that the default value has changed. > > I meant wrt this latest reported problem. Neither t nor nil fixes that. That seems to contradict my guess. >> But you could make sure that (1) the bug is here with 2013-12-14 when >> you set `w32-enable-frame-resize-hack' to t and (2) the bug is not here >> with 2013-12-16 when you set `w32-enable-frame-resize-hack' to nil > > Not sure what you mean. Which bug, the thumbnail frame problem or the > current problem? Please clarify what you would like me to try/test. The current mode line problem. Please try once more. If setting this variable doesn't change anything, it can't be the cause and we have to look elsewhere. >> BTW: Does Info still display a header line when the mode line is lost? > > Yes. Strange. martin