From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48249: 28.0.50; Regression: emacs confused about window configuration due to ido-mode and/or winner-mode Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 07:30:29 +0000 Message-ID: <531453ddd62d1011193c@heytings.org> References: <87zgx8wmew.fsf@secretsauce.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28657"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48249@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dima Kogan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 09:31:43 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leYU3-0007Jj-7v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 09:31:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44546 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leYU2-0005Ix-BQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:31:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leYTO-00051t-1g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leYTN-00015Y-Ow for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leYTN-0001zM-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 07:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48249 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48249-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48249.16202862337626 (code B ref 48249); Thu, 06 May 2021 07:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 07:30:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36902 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leYSv-0001yw-D9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:39740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leYSs-0001ym-Ms for 48249@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:30:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1620286229; bh=HstcTA7e8I0uO6+y7V7k7M51YvonWQdnW7PCwCa4sGA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=auAo8e5B85mzY0UPLoNowWgzG+rgDGafa55rL0yYffd258WHQfrHLWDKdwpJZK1Hl CX2iwA6EeBpeuUS5/wWAdtZUK4RSUU0Ug6oDgOZmDTjEyIE6+xr7TYoB4NPw6CllsU 9D+S+K319WrFMrR7VzHysZWJHShdOSrU7R/lg7hnoYw4njGgs48XallkvGn69tPQzw RX6wDi0eaXNTJcORxQytIa5ngx4tA9+3RDPNbyY9UXy7F1j0KBWUA7fv6HqlxDcqma mi4xb6Gt3p6k+MDghw9rGLyhILNPkC3CEcrkPYpgasQu+wEKkRIN3RfKMWIL1GesPr B0fSJChMKNndg== In-Reply-To: <87zgx8wmew.fsf@secretsauce.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205754 Archived-At: > > I've been observing a really annoying behavior regression for the last > few months. It was somewhat elusive, but I finally just figured out how > to reproduce it, so I'm now reporting the bug. > > Emacs periodically gets into a confused state, where simple commands > like (switch-to-other-buffer) start doing strange things (switching to > the wrong buffer, messing with the window configuration, etc). And the > point often gets stuck in the minibuffer, requiring an explicit switch > command to get out of there. Killing that emacs frame, and starting a > new one (I'm using the emacs server) would fix it for the new frame for > a while, until that frame gets confused too. > > 1. emacs -Q --eval "(progn (ido-mode 'buffers) (winner-mode))" > 2. C-x b RET > 3. C-c LEFT > 4. M-x > 5. C-g > Thanks for your bug report. The bug of this specific recipe is due to commit 7c2ebf6e23. I wonder how many more bug reports are needed before the lesson of that failed experiment will finally be drawn.