From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16694: Regression by commit 115663 (bzr): Theme face attributes no longer take precedence over X resources Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:46:39 +0100 Message-ID: <530A25EF.6080306@binary-island.eu> References: <52F601AE.5040309@binary-island.eu> <52FE6BD6.7090607@binary-island.eu> <83txbt4p37.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppmg4yvv.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393174033 29978 80.91.229.3 (23 Feb 2014 16:47:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16694@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 23 17:47:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcD2-0005DJ-QJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:47:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53398 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcD2-000792-Gj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:47:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcCs-00078u-8K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:47:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcCk-0001g3-U3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:47:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcCk-0001fz-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcCk-0002D6-AD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Matthias Dahl Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16694 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16694-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16694.13931740148483 (code B ref 16694); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16694) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2014 16:46:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36736 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcCc-0002Cl-9O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:46:54 -0500 Original-Received: from hemera.binary-island.eu ([97.107.138.233]:33835) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcCV-0002CL-Fm for 16694@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:46:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.0.0.20] (95-88-237-116-dynip.superkabel.de [95.88.237.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hemera.binary-island.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA2983C0D5; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:52:13 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 In-Reply-To: <83ppmg4yvv.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86074 Archived-At: Hello... Sorry for my late reply. :( > If no one objects in a couple of days, I think we should install it. Good to hear. If you don't mind, I'd like to take a closer look again and probably revise the original comments to match the new behavior. Also, maybe add a second patch to pull the check up into the utility function itself and refactor the few bits and pieces where it is used accordingly. I'll try to get this done within the next few days. > Stefan "who experiences bug#16378 all the time" I had a look at the description of bug #16378 but unfortunately I couldn't make head or tail of it. If you don't mind filling me in, I'd try to track this one down as well. So long, Matthias