From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16649: Right margin overflows on neighboring windows. Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:14:11 +0100 Message-ID: <52F4C003.5040106@gmx.at> References: <87siryf1kp.fsf@gmail.com> <52F2171F.7080605@gmx.at> <8761oth6oz.fsf@gmail.com> <87a9e37i9w.fsf@gmail.com> <83sirvxsuf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391771716 32737 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2014 11:15:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16649@debbugs.gnu.org, E Sabof To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 07 12:15:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjOy-00016f-SK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:15:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjOy-0003zE-Ds for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:15:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjOo-0003z6-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:15:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjOh-00073k-KC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjOh-00073T-9l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjOg-0004K3-4w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16649.139177165616527 (code B ref 16649); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2014 11:14:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjNw-0004IU-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:65473) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBjNu-0004IM-KS for 16649@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.53.151] ([62.47.53.151]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LsOsW-1VEAl33Ez2-0123sA for <16649@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:14:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83sirvxsuf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+BlqVblaYm4GOBG1ecoewxhRXT3QFMbZVkvsjNUfMY/bg1V1DoQ ToZfDKtl7kdc02urKASxG3BkJUcnNuFRzE3Ln+sd5K5bIu2usNjW692LePYtPMBPgdkaXUX 9KW9CNXV5JSujNnzywcZgyP7lhDgTT6Jy9Gv7KOoof4cE5jw7H1Oq1X7myKKoFf/4M9CLxq DM6zrk4sizHxoGwuz9L4Q== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84811 Archived-At: > Could you please tell what exactly is wrong with display in the above > test case? And what does "the margin overflows" mean? Maybe I'm > blind, but I don't see anything wrong when I eval the above code. You have to do C-x 3 and enlarge one of the windows to see the effects. There were plenty of them - mostly related to not returning the right values via window box related functions. I also now adjust the window margins when a window gets to narrow because otherwise the redisplay engine gets confused when inserting new text. Still pretty toothless when confronted with more drastic specifications but the best I came up with so far. martin