From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16526: 24.3.50; scroll-conservatively & c-mode regression Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: <52EE45B8.3050608@gmx.at> References: <83r47wausm.fsf@gnu.org> <52E3EAC2.2040100@gmx.at> <83lhy4as2l.fsf@gnu.org> <52E4019C.5080905@gmx.at> <83k3dnc3rl.fsf@gnu.org> <83iot7c3bq.fsf@gnu.org> <52E4EF61.3050404@gmx.at> <831tzubqxw.fsf@gnu.org> <20140126204310.GA3937@acm.acm> <52E61704.6050807@gmx.at> <20140129223626.GD3092@acm.acm> <52EA0124.4000809@gmx.at> <52EA57D6.5080403@gmx.at> <83txcl75nj.fsf@gnu.org> <52EAA0C9.1090000@gmx.at> <834n4j5d3k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391347162 13296 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2014 13:19:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 13:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, 16526@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 02 14:19:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9wxL-0006af-Iw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:19:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41333 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9wxL-00025Z-2u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:19:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9wxB-00023h-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:19:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9wx4-0006Yz-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9www-0006Y5-CI; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9www-0001bj-1N; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16526 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16526-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16526.13913471386167 (code B ref 16526); Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2014 13:18:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9wwr-0001bP-Kj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:18:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:61361) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9wwp-0001bG-El for 16526@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 08:18:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.51.179] ([62.47.51.179]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LuP5z-1V94un0e19-011jlY for <16526@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:18:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <834n4j5d3k.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PUDmoz/yrP8TZIzTFYp3ylWg5pVH+McGq1eCBKvoDb8ePdsKq00 +gE9RMAP6qVDTmT4xuWruONdmgpkvMdM0SQjRc92I2FzcPqQK3DrIsl6dWHGa/Cm33Q774q GT2qqf9M1PaGEjbM+uw9W5mWMVWJez0N5d7bok1s1rPPFuSt0zi0tjaCaV8A1EN9U0NCmsH s4V1I9Y/EsCDrOsJd762Q== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84444 Archived-At: > When the frame is not maximized, the window height is smaller, so > 'recenter' moves back a smaller amount of pixels, and calls > jit-lock-function at a different buffer position. That call takes > only about 2 sec (still quite a lot, IMO). Thanks for the explanation. It would never have occurred to me that different window starts could cause such a difference in execution time. martin