From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16340: 24.3.50; Maximize to the left/right side of the screen (on Windows 7 & 8) Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:36:08 +0100 Message-ID: <52CC3B08.9050908@gmx.at> References: <52C935EB.9030109@gmx.at> <52CB0AF7.8010304@gmx.at> <52CB2822.1070503@gmx.at> <52CB5423.50309@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389116236 13066 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2014 17:37:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16340@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 07 18:37:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aae-0003BS-PE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:37:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42064 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aae-0000MD-4m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:37:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aaT-0000Lx-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:37:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aaM-0007f1-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:37:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aaM-0007ew-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aaM-0003kv-0x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16340 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16340-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16340.138911618114360 (code B ref 16340); Tue, 07 Jan 2014 17:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16340) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2014 17:36:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41324 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aZg-0003jX-M5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:36:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:55012) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0aZe-0003jP-Q3 for 16340@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 12:36:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.56.51] ([62.47.56.51]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LwaQZ-1VKfGw3oYJ-018Mub for <16340@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 18:36:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52CB5423.50309@dancol.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:L2V2m6e18gRMZypt2N4mWuivNwg1/Qy8VuwLslvTxxpbBV3VdWe wA6NHCp2fqGHK0VfQoWP+toe3Fw7T+R5jwvMAKcR34ZR7nQuz4Jj/f4XWlbDfXNxFIVTphk IaoWAirRzS7vUFRaXvtfXVGSivR4Q42SFWTZewvULe28RQ0IZyBBbBAZDeMWF5hsqOdZW4i 9vviU8qBuvZANsy2UhAfQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83126 Archived-At: > By the way: M-: (setq frame-resize-pixelwise t) seems to affect new > frames, but not the current one. It affects the current one _after_ the first resize operation on it. > Is that expected behavior? Yes. This option should be rather used only in .emacs. It expresses a global preference of the user, should not be bound or set interactively. martin