From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16340: 24.3.50; Maximize to the left/right side of the screen (on Windows 7 & 8) Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:58:47 +0100 Message-ID: <52CB0AF7.8010304@gmx.at> References: <52C935EB.9030109@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389038361 24765 80.91.229.3 (6 Jan 2014 19:59:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 19:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16340@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 06 20:59:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GKV-00068G-LC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:59:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37371 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GKV-0000th-CM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:59:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GKL-0000qt-Nf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:59:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GKE-0006Nl-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GKE-0006Ng-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GKD-0001Tr-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16340 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16340-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16340.13890383415683 (code B ref 16340); Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16340) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2014 19:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GKC-0001Ta-8l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:59:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:50095) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GK8-0001TN-Jh for 16340@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:58:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.50.117] ([62.47.50.117]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LkBPy-1VOROf0CxG-00c76r for <16340@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:58:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Ghlb77uCOKjuZfG5elj9Lhb5hL8p8LvLy987y9WMnWzp/dyC1WD cftr4ZuYDs5/PqWXVi3pSCeacNo9cVQtUOY5J0tADE8tRvctF3Qd9rFXO2RCJUq7X/nHDsi iu/IPXHxmN/pbE+4Sg/K5YocP9nngKUrlY3NYnmVpZENhwH+7mToVJ09Rr1ThuSCwvLArXG MIFsuU4SyqgvLrtQxF8XQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83069 Archived-At: > Ok: the new frame I create after setting 'frame-resize-pixelwise' to > 't' doesn't have the problem reported in this bug, i.e. that frame > fits exactly in the left/right half of the screen when I do "windows > key" + "left/right arrow". So all I can say is that Windows obeys your size hints. If you can live with pixelwise resized frames (I do so for almost a year now) continue to do so. Otherwise you have to live with the gaps. Tertium non datur. >> And please tell me the values of (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) >> before, during and after you left the "maximized to the left" state. > > '(frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen)' returns 'nil' before, during and > after the "maximization to the left". Thanks. This confirms what Juanma told me earlier. martin