From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14949: Snapped window acts like a fullscreen one (Windows 7) Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:00:20 +0100 Message-ID: <52C99DB4.4040501@gmx.at> References: <52C82BD1.1050704@gmx.at> <52C935FA.3070205@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388944877 18600 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2014 18:01:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 18:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14949@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 05 19:01:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzs0o-0005W1-GA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:01:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58890 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzs0o-0004TP-5g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzs0d-0004Mw-2F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzs0U-0004Vp-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:01:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzs0U-0004Vl-Cv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzs0U-0003jI-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14949 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14949-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14949.138894482914277 (code B ref 14949); Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14949) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2014 18:00:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzrzw-0003iD-M7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:00:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:53577) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzrzv-0003i4-0Y for 14949@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:00:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.55.195] ([62.47.55.195]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LpsIh-1VWHwE3VXr-00ff3m for <14949@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:00:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0EJuCcaHYC+gIiyA+tgBS3zF+xB572zZL4I4Qp6yKJiDUyCuVMQ SyA+PnF5RaGXO0Gwm2NdWaVbwbfEd0nCMjKA4AbXxU69g9JDDw1oD1PkJw9DglkmkGFStiG GDMyjheD9fiayCrduNAFHHhxrVyVL37MMfqzDm5/630D4rdcIKsOQRekDErR1rfX/tNlT70 XiTGWmlfPO4i/vSbxix5Q== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83013 Archived-At: > No. Neither resizing the frame by hand nor using Win+left (or > Win+right) modifies the fullscreen frame parameter. That's what I'm > describing as a bug: > > Case 1: > emacs -Q > resize by hand > M-: (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) => nil > M-: (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen nil) => nothing changes > > Case 2: > emacs -Q > Win+Left > M-: (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) => nil > M-: (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen nil) > => the pre-Win+left frame size and position is restored But that's precisely the mystery. It clearly indicates that Win+Left does something different than just setting the frame size and position and I don't have the slightest idea what that could be. For example, if I here first evaluate (modify-frame-parameters nil '((height . 61) (width . 80) (top . 0) (left . 0))) which gives my frame the same height as FULLHEIGHT and then evaluate (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen nil) that doesn't change anything. Can you understand the mystery? martin