From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:58:49 +0100 Message-ID: <52B5F2F9.1070802@gmx.at> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387655965 17721 80.91.229.3 (21 Dec 2013 19:59:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 21 20:59:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSht-000192-TL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:59:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55377 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VuShk-0008Bj-LG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:59:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSha-00080c-Cy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:59:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VuShT-0007Jw-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:59:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VuShT-0007Jr-04 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuShR-00028i-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16207 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16207-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16207.13876559388213 (code B ref 16207); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 19:58:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuShO-00028N-4q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:58:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:52985) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuShK-00028E-HY for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.35.33] ([62.47.35.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfzEP-1W6Cme2yd3-00NV3N for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:58:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83zjnu82lr.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:t458SDs9yE5I8OXQofVitJ6i/rp2xhuD7FeQJrvVv0jrqU1di4Z GecDgO8fVMZBwiSYa1S6dVLStp0hb8v+xsKyF1VBTKPBlLymJqTfH55LwqryVUgKPQQWh7T Ni7Gwkr5yULgP0ExBdhxF2tdvMlJ0wYcaq9tW/K2/0MbxoRmbIHp7BhP/Qme/uZpvH/6pL/ v9LGl9y4ZLqqrsE8avCZg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82359 Archived-At: > Maybe one way is to think how could this happen, ever. How can such > window even exist? I think I know what's causing it. But I have to do some testing before checking in a fix. In any case, don't bother about this until you hear from me. martin