From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16207: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:40:45 +0100 Message-ID: <52B5EEBD.8020807@gmx.at> References: <617f6b6d-0c1e-4721-bbb1-7c9fefea4bb2@default> <52B5CCA2.1080406@gmx.at> <52B5DE93.4080407@gmx.at> <83vbyi820q.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387654880 6856 80.91.229.3 (21 Dec 2013 19:41:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 16207@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 21 20:41:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSQM-0004GX-QZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:41:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55352 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSQM-0005bh-Fk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:41:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSQB-0005VU-Jq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSQ4-0002lF-6I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:41:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSQ4-0002lB-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSQ3-0001ag-NE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:41:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:41:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16207 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16207-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16207.13876548556088 (code B ref 16207); Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:41:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2013 19:40:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33591 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSPu-0001a8-Qs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:55672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VuSPs-0001Zz-JE for 16207@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:40:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.35.33] ([62.47.35.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLNeQ-1Vv0Nd2gUc-000b92 for <16207@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:40:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83vbyi820q.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Qjm2CwUTw/2yK29T+MjfIkoi8oBDnK4P8GMoWHfl9yzg6PYW9Nv 9o+le1Pr4Mw4WsBK2xLquK2QgnEWBKSVh/JHWRQqkeh4R6ivxQDstw5Z4TDO3OLje+uaQdY gmGIJ5Yy0DldeS1aLT3fQF6oiMagcFpjFL9SAa0mAQJakLY3oibqfTdj9oQEaiBgQw1XlW+ 5g5ocjgYmk6HX+BwrgQ2A== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82358 Archived-At: >> Which is obviously bug#16051 which I've been now able to reproduce for >> the first time. And it's definitively the toolbar-window which causes >> the crash. Too silly - I sent my message to the 16207 thread and meant to send it to the 16051 one where you already remarked my missing insight. So please disregard the remarks Eli cited on top of this mail in the current thread: The toolbar window is by no means involved and neither is this bug related to bug#16051. > But then the XBUFFER thing is bogus, because the tool-bar window never > has a buffer. Its 'contents' field is always nil. If the toolbar window ended up here, something crazy would have happened indeed. martin