From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16017: 24.3.50; windmove is broken Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 19:16:10 +0100 Message-ID: <529CCE6A.90908@gmx.at> References: <87bo1172xf.fsf@yandex.ru> <529C38E4.1020305@gmx.at> <529C60FE.9030903@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386008238 16476 80.91.229.3 (2 Dec 2013 18:17:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 18:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16017@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 02 19:17:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VnY3c-0001Di-T3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 19:17:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38263 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnY3c-0007ER-En for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:17:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnY3R-0007E4-Vs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:17:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnY3K-0000AE-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40989) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnY3K-0000A8-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnY3K-0006nK-Bs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16017 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16017.138600818626029 (code B ref 16017); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2013 18:16:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55002 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnY2j-0006ll-RO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:16:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:52296) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnY2i-0006lY-M7 for 16017@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:16:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.32.26] ([62.47.32.26]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LwJko-1VXQgm368E-0183y6 for <16017@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 19:16:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <529C60FE.9030903@yandex.ru> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yAPEutY1J0YL8jFTlODBhfJLV7wEl6geg8B28ze/0EZeCzb1ZY9 aUdjeYMoaQXDESeX42SRKKZuTLhBGKcidz0/X2iBgaf9aPxGtDiHJWPoRbO7edeshDKrr1S z+Z9VkzNjNojpMm0Lqg4Wh/rNTl7168lii1NwAAAxCJsqy7nu3Z09FWhmALayd3QwcreRzm SoB6j0go59qnHKZM5eqeg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81269 Archived-At: > What does help, is changing `windmove-window-distance-delta' from 1 to > 2. So the problem is likely to do with off-by-one errors in `window-edges'. In a sense, yes. When I assign columns and lines from pixel sizes I have to round sometimes. IIRC I tried to make the sums and the adjacent edges fit but maybe I failed or there's another issue involved. I'll look into this as soon as I sorted out bug 16013 (unless you wanted to have a look). martin