From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:42:01 +0100 Message-ID: <52937DD9.8080801@gmx.at> References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> <5292FC0E.4050907@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385397798 29359 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2013 16:43:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15961@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 25 17:43:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzFp-0001pA-UN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:43:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53689 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzFp-0008Q9-JJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzFf-0008Jm-4e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:43:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzFW-0006o6-Qm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:43:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58987) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzFW-0006nx-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzFW-00020R-HA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15961 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15961-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15961.13853977397634 (code B ref 15961); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15961) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2013 16:42:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44769 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzEo-0001z4-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:42:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:49974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzEm-0001yp-9q for 15961@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:42:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.62.195] ([62.47.62.195]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOOdZ-1VhOCt0clR-005s5p for <15961@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:42:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8ca1kvzWlhY62xQRY6jURHzmxlXdxnchReWEJWo18GxoaWaVVC0 cQLa5CFYYss6jY4kTCMzGpmSwG68FqMPTDAiHmecXxudixjjoT+kj9B+xc+dCJ9fLP+GBwJ Eq8zWxrtkNv6Jwy/tZ5gIzbLjUahLGtZ+FpYyGnJo3scoYmhsZd6Y/X1PAU5q4dezahCG8T v+n2d4uChyfaBUIYXa+8w== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80953 Archived-At: > I think we're miscommunicating. I was pointing out that binding > split-width-threshold in display-buffer-at-bottom is OK because it can > still be overridden by the user. OK. Committed as revision 115229 on trunk. martin