From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13594: Planning Emacs-24.4 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:20:35 +0100 Message-ID: <528A3043.2090109@gmx.at> References: <5289F003.5040708@gmx.at> <528A13DA.1030309@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384788081 13194 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2013 15:21:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13594@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 18 16:21:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ViQdb-0001vE-Ls for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:21:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44409 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViQdb-000487-2Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:21:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViQdR-00047y-KU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:21:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViQdK-00079u-9u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViQdK-00079m-7O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViQdJ-0002m8-Kp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 13594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13594.138478805210604 (code B ref 13594); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2013 15:20:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60225 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViQdA-0002kx-6W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:20:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:58968) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ViQd7-0002k3-G5 for 13594@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:20:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.47.55.138] ([62.47.55.138]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MBWTO-1VrkZI2E46-00AZG8 for <13594@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:20:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PRc0PyqG/yj7UqdvJcrb8iJbRy5qQkiSVOn2Pbeozi/KPBaPJD8 8Lp2oVQ+mh5KKnOU6BIppxCzh4uIyXr8Os9l3oWEqDSeSpChgfMVsmkh5sWZ9wy/JVDA4k+ jcPCy8r88vUQCiyiH9uPJcaRk3D/4iqxcPFZrZlIldanxAfg4DeE7ME91Py3TTcoSjrBrtA +BAUJkAE/TQIwJZBn/0LQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80733 Archived-At: > I wonder if at this point you can take over fixing this bug. I am > unfamiliar with windowing. So I might not be able to propose a fix in > perspective. I thought you intially wanted to fix the problem that a caller cannot handle a nil return value from `display-buffer'. But Stefan says that it's not necessary to do that and I agree with him. So your fix is OK but I'd just make the last line of `display-buffer' something like (when (windowp window) window) and you don't have to talk about a return value of t. Returning t sounds not very intuitive when a function fails to accomplish something. martin