From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15432: 24.3.50; Bootstrap fails Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 20:59:44 +0200 Message-ID: <523DECA0.90403@swipnet.se> References: <3D9072C4-7A47-4D74-AA5C-8E17725A0A2A@swipnet.se> <6csiwyqdf5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1379790022 23374 80.91.229.3 (21 Sep 2013 19:00:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15432@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 21 21:00:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VNSPn-0003eE-Vu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:00:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32921 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VNSPn-0006PG-Md for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 15:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VNSPe-0006Mx-VT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 15:00:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VNSPZ-00013L-0B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 15:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VNSPY-00013H-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 15:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VNSPW-00008r-Um for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 15:00:07 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Jan D." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:00:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15432 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15432-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15432.1379789993472 (code B ref 15432); Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:00:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15432) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2013 18:59:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54091 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VNSPJ-00007Y-0S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:59:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.bdtv.se ([176.10.222.34]:34660) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VNSPG-00007L-CX for 15432@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:59:51 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 6608 invoked by uid 89); 21 Sep 2013 18:59:48 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-57.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.57) by mail01.bdtv.se with ESMTPA; 21 Sep 2013 18:59:48 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.2] (gaffa [172.20.199.2]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E60361A0235; Sat, 21 Sep 2013 20:59:47 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: <6csiwyqdf5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:78661 Archived-At: Hello. Glenn Morris skrev 2013-09-21 19:42: > Jan Djärv wrote: > >> Bisect suggests this version introduced the error, but is does not >> seem obvious what the fault is: > No need to bisect. The hydra coverage job (does anyone pay attention to > this?) begain failing in this way when it switched from 114409 to > 114410. > > http://hydra.nixos.org/eval/999225 Nothing like a pointless bisect on saturday morning :-) Jan D.