From: Ryan <rct@thompsonclan.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 3984@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#3984:
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:03:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523BD72B.9010404@thompsonclan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <523BD5F5.1020600@thompsonclan.org>
On a related note, what is the proper way to test for the new advice
system? (featurep 'nadvice)?
Anyway, now that we have a fix for when call-interactively is advised,
what do you want to do about the case where the called function is
advised with the innermost advice being around? The only problem we
really need to solve is being absolutely whether or not a given stack
frame is the innermost function in an advice stack. The two options that
I can see are a complete top-down search or modifying around advice so
that it gives a consistent signature (e.g. by wrapping the advised
function in a special lambda.
-Ryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-20 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-30 22:37 bug#3984: 23.0.96; defadvice of call-interactively defeats interactive-p Drew Adams
2009-07-31 1:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-07-31 14:19 ` Drew Adams
2009-07-31 19:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-07-31 20:04 ` Drew Adams
2011-10-10 6:00 ` Kai Tetzlaff
2011-10-11 14:26 ` Drew Adams
2011-10-11 15:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-10-11 16:05 ` Drew Adams
2013-09-10 20:29 ` Christopher Wellons
2013-09-11 0:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-09-13 8:56 ` bug#3984: Fix for #3984 Ryan
2013-09-13 13:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-09-13 18:30 ` Ryan
2013-09-13 19:27 ` Ryan
2013-09-13 21:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-09-17 3:18 ` Ryan
2013-09-17 13:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-09-17 17:22 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-18 1:46 ` bug#3984: Stefan Monnier
2013-09-18 23:30 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-19 0:47 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-19 3:38 ` bug#3984: Stefan Monnier
2013-09-19 8:06 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-19 19:23 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-19 20:59 ` bug#3984: Stefan Monnier
2013-09-19 21:59 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-20 4:23 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-20 4:58 ` bug#3984: Fix case where call-interactively is advised Ryan
2013-09-20 5:03 ` Ryan [this message]
2013-09-20 14:35 ` bug#3984: Stefan Monnier
2013-09-20 16:54 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-20 16:56 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-20 14:54 ` bug#3984: Stefan Monnier
2013-09-20 16:50 ` bug#3984: Ryan
2013-09-20 19:59 ` bug#3984: Stefan Monnier
2013-09-13 10:24 ` bug#3984: bug#123: Potential fix Ryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523BD72B.9010404@thompsonclan.org \
--to=rct@thompsonclan.org \
--cc=3984@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).