From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14829: (no subject) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:10:05 +0200 Message-ID: <51EE2C4D.5040702@gmx.at> References: <20130708170808.555814cb@limelight.wooz.org> <20130711153743.1858db0d@anarchist> <51ED6DC3.6040501@gmx.at> <20130722134222.72c122d3@limelight.wooz.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374563649 6406 80.91.229.3 (23 Jul 2013 07:14:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14829@debbugs.gnu.org To: Barry Warsaw Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 23 09:14:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V1WnO-0006er-8n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:14:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57757 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1WnN-0006fw-QO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1WnK-0006fe-6q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1WkR-0006XR-L2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1WkR-0006XM-F2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1WkQ-0006Z4-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14829 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14829.137456342625098 (code B ref 14829); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jul 2013 07:10:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Wjp-0006Wb-4j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:10:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:53132) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1Wjl-0006WC-7k for 14829@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.61.84] ([62.47.61.84]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LjLwB-1UOsnY0L55-00daga for <14829@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:10:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130722134222.72c122d3@limelight.wooz.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pbgO3pVujqWaCg+h5BNdRtVOzXUe6Dg0/vapRpaWNC4VjsBMer4 Fu/5JG0jU9DgUvJ2LML3PzMgs351Of9VkjAqE5jyVZPd9oUX34GxcOew+jlDt2vkdeqkkIp UuLvx9e7lJrqvao8NufLuxiAx59mOQzdGw7+guBgSFboz1+O+Cf7TMveOJsyJD9F7cpGVmN XZZfUeX3C36I6wAdnf7MQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76586 Archived-At: >> Why not declare `split-window-keep-point' obsolete and always keep >> point? > > Please no! C-x 2 with split-window-keep-point nil is a *really* important > feature, to me at least. OK. Don't worry ;-) martin