From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14829: 24.3; split-window-keep-point breaks shell tab completion Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:12:57 +0200 Message-ID: <51DFD6A9.9020901@gmx.at> References: <20130708170808.555814cb@limelight.wooz.org> <51DFBC46.6020709@gmx.at> <83bo685dth.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373624047 25527 80.91.229.3 (12 Jul 2013 10:14:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14829@debbugs.gnu.org, barry@python.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 12 12:14:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UxaMa-0006g8-DC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:14:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53400 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UxaMZ-0001sY-SR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45593) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UxaMW-0001pO-3Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UxaMV-0004ay-67 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UxaMV-0004au-2p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UxaMU-0000LN-Oo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14829 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14829.13736239901222 (code B ref 14829); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2013 10:13:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49667 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UxaLe-0000Jc-Bk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:57987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UxaLb-0000J2-UV for 14829@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 06:13:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.41.10] ([62.47.41.10]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MVeCF-1UgDHG2qJb-00Yy3Z; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:13:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83bo685dth.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4EotP5dq/JQocX5D6EtEOfXOj4e852pTmWLjMBWMiSe7fZzl2Eg aUPnGamhauvoTvUjRJ50TLlvV3jNd8IWsEjy+ClRyyylAcmCRZiVSU8UCVCKo3uiGJI90ea 9yvsQtOzdbKiXCIvrl3QRa5ueJLkyIlX4Nxa0ob2NgxgXeaj8aEH4UGS7lOQNTM1FP779c8 OkY5S6g62IgyS5Wiy9Bvw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76276 Archived-At: > Maybe it is split, and then deleted, before we have a chance of > displaying it? Maybe it is not split at all for other reasons. But that decision should never be affected by `split-window-keep-point'. Barry, can you check whether and/or why not a window splitting occurs? martin