From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14448: Wrong indentation in comment lines for F90 mode? Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:51:35 +0200 Message-ID: <519DF4B7.4020304@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369308994 2681 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2013 11:36:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:36:34 +0000 (UTC) To: 14448@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 23 13:36:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UfToq-000387-Uh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:36:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35991 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfToq-0001WV-3E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfTog-0001VR-Ew for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfToa-0003BC-PF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfToa-0003Au-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfTpN-0008Jj-Oh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Angelo Graziosi Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 14448 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-emacs Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.136930901831958 (code B ref -1); Thu, 23 May 2013 11:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2013 11:36:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57685 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfTpJ-0008JO-Ug for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57484) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UfTpI-0008J6-7s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfToM-00036y-OM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:45561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfToM-00036u-L1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:35:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfToI-0001R0-Vr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:35:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfToC-00034y-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:35:54 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp204.alice.it ([82.57.200.100]:59122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfT7d-0005tG-UZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] (80.183.93.76) by smtp204.alice.it (8.6.060.15) (authenticated as angelo.graziosi@alice.it) id 512397E607083098 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:51:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:74481 Archived-At: Start Emacs with $ emacs -Q & then "C-x C-f foo.f90". Now type "!" to start a comment line and then type M-j to produce other comment lines. The result is as follow: ! ! ! ! ! from the second line, the comment is indented. Repeating the same steps for a C++ mode file, "C-x C-f foo.cpp", the result is // // // // // without indentation. I would expect the same for F90 mode... So, is the behavior in F90 mode to be expected (on purpose) or is it wrong? Ciao, Angelo.