From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14062: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:22:00 +0200 Message-ID: <516C5358.8040709@gmx.at> References: <75799AB3F22B457D85197F174077F208@us.oracle.com> <83wqstxrbo.fsf@gnu.org> <83fvzhxcdn.fsf@gnu.org> <8338vfyiy4.fsf@gnu.org> <838v4k6yc4.fsf@gnu.org> <516BF54E.9020802@gmx.at> <83y5cj6fo5.fsf@gnu.org> <516C2276.3020006@gmx.at> <83obdf69yz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366053773 24975 80.91.229.3 (15 Apr 2013 19:22:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 14062@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 15 21:22:56 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1URozQ-0002Zt-HY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:22:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URozP-0000sa-S1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:22:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URozL-0000r3-5N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:22:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URozJ-0000jm-QV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:22:51 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URozJ-0000jg-Mh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1URp3O-0007VR-FI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14062 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14062-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14062.136605399228773 (code B ref 14062); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14062) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2013 19:26:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1URp2t-0007U0-Qk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:26:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:60122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1URp2p-0007Ti-9J for 14062@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.1]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MJYft-1UQS4N108Z-0037xu for <14062@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 21:22:12 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 19:22:11 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-43-9.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.43.9]) [62.47.43.9] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 15 Apr 2013 21:22:11 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18uZZhh3tAu/SWMnX2H8RCYee9c9fzPngYBpvqDYG 5/riNTwfMagpFE In-Reply-To: <83obdf69yz.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73438 Archived-At: > But for nil, BUFFERP will return zero, and the code that uses XBUFFER > should not be called, IMO. [...] > But the uninitialized contents field should be zero, no? Again, it > should not pass the BUFFERP test. > > So the mystery still stands. You mean that the w->contents argument of XBUFFER _always_ passes the BUFFERP test first and then fails at the assertion in XBUFFER? How can that make sense? martin