From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36252: 26.1; bibtex-generate-autokey does not use use date field Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 00:18:55 -0600 Message-ID: <51535.53516.186619.24525@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <20190616202330.immdadcg24qedysq@zeta.rak.ac> <871rz3dxfw.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <20190715003421.qrb65bynacpxca2k@zeta.rak.ac> <87k1a8q7ld.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgcu7oja.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn6o766s.fsf@gnus.org> <87im9gpq17.fsf@pniedzielski.net> <874kkzl20d.fsf@yandex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2463"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 36252@debbugs.gnu.org To: Colin Baxter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 07 07:20:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1km9sf-0000WM-84 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 07:20:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1km9se-0001pF-2c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 01:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1km9sQ-0001p3-6H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 01:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1km9sP-00010a-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 01:20:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1km9sP-0008Ef-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 01:20:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Roland Winkler" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36252 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 36252-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36252.160732194431585 (code B ref 36252); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 06:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36252) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2020 06:19:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52109 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1km9rU-0008DN-32 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 01:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1km9rS-0008Ct-HE for 36252@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 01:19:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1km9rN-0000XQ-0q; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 01:18:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [2602:30a:2e52:d720:65b7:1416:12e7:8bfb] (port=60794 helo=regnitz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1km9rM-0007qR-KZ; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 01:18:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874kkzl20d.fsf@yandex.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195209 Archived-At: On Sun Dec 6 2020 Colin Baxter wrote: > I am a heavy user of bibtex, but I am puzzled over the 'date' > field. Publications have a 'year' ok, sometimes a 'month', but never > have I seen a 'day'. So how would a user enter (YYYY-MM-DD)? Is it > perhaps the date of entry of the record in to the file? Sorry to butt > in, but I am curious. ISO8601 permits dates like YYYY, YYYY-MM, and YYYY-MM-DD. I agree, the last format is likely rare in the context of citations. This smells to me as if internally biblatex relies on a canned library handling iso8601 formats.