From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13066: 24.2.90; setting rmail-summary-window-size causes error Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:08:06 +0100 Message-ID: <50E67FD6.7060802@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357283349 16439 80.91.229.3 (4 Jan 2013 07:09:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 07:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13066@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 04 08:09:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1P4-0001BS-8Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:09:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1Op-0001Jv-0O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:09:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1Oj-0001IU-Tt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:09:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1Oi-0000U1-Um for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:08:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1Oi-0000Tt-RA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:08:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1On-0002c0-OI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13066 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13066-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13066.13572833079985 (code B ref 13066); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13066) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2013 07:08:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42541 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1OD-0002az-CI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:08:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:49204) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr1O6-0002am-OJ for 13066@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:08:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.17]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M4lZj-1T62IT32C5-00z2Qt for <13066@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:08:12 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jan 2013 07:08:12 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-57-118.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.57.118]) [62.47.57.118] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 04 Jan 2013 08:08:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19OIhJUax5Oju0RAddw1wMwuVX3+QAhKHDR1gUDi8 TBAAH5GmqinymB In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69374 Archived-At: > My understanding of rmail-redisplay-summary is that when it > is non-nil, rmail-summary-buffer is forced to be shown. For > instance, when rmail-summary-buffer is buried and I change > the current message in RMAIL buffer by typing p, > rmail-summary-buffer pops up. As I don't want that > behavior, I haven't customized rmail-redisplay-summary to t. > > What I want is that rmail-summary-buffer is shown in some > window of the specified height when I type h in RMAIL > buffer. Do you sometimes type h to make sure that an already displayed summary buffer's window has the "right" size? Or do you use h always to make the summary buffer reappear on screen? martin