From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13225: 24.3.50; Non-selected window has not mode-line-inactive face Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:24:39 +0100 Message-ID: <50D47127.9040201@gmx.at> References: <50D176DF.4080102@gmx.at> <83zk1anhzd.fsf@gnu.org> <50D2E16B.70804@gmx.at> <83623wofhj.fsf@gnu.org> <50D349E6.3080200@gmx.at> <83y5gsmxq3.fsf@gnu.org> <50D428CA.5070806@gmx.at> <83ehijn3xl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356099960 24215 80.91.229.3 (21 Dec 2012 14:26:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13225@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 21 15:26:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm3YE-0000N1-79 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:26:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60662 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm3Y0-0007SY-89 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm3Xr-0007SG-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:25:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm3Xo-00047d-Rw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:25:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm3Xo-00047X-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:25:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm3Y1-0005q9-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13225 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13225-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13225.135609991922385 (code B ref 13225); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13225) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2012 14:25:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm3X6-0005om-Qn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:25:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:49924) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tm3X1-0005oO-Ua for 13225@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.33]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MAiyD-1Txr5a2g2N-00Btif for <13225@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:24:45 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2012 14:24:45 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-34-50.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.34.50]) [62.47.34.50] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 21 Dec 2012 15:24:45 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ON+4rsDhOkxdSMkQygOOVOcftSgfqVDUT7xaNiy mRZHkEkRNqBbSY In-Reply-To: <83ehijn3xl.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68853 Archived-At: >> Then indeed we should not de-highlight a mode line when its frame is >> not highlighted because we would lose some useful feedback. > > Maybe, but that could be a surprise to users, who are used to > different behavior. Sorry, we probably miscommunicated. What I described should have reflected the status quo: When the minibuffer is active (regardless of whether it's standalone, global, or on the only visible frame), that fact is communicated by giving it the active cursor. At the same time, the mode line of the window that was selected before the minibuffer became active is still highlighted as active. Is that correct? martin