From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Brown Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13112: 24.2.90; The cygw32 build should disable X11 Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:32:15 -0500 Message-ID: <50C2605F.4000207@cornell.edu> References: <50C1E941.2080609@cornell.edu> <87k3stiutx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87boe5iscr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354915969 3689 80.91.229.3 (7 Dec 2012 21:32:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13112@debbugs.gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 22:33:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Th5XV-0004L7-Cw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:32:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55243 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th5XJ-0004fK-8G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:32:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th5XG-0004fB-PG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:32:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th5XF-0000Ub-MX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:32:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th5XF-0000UX-J2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:32:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Th5XZ-00052z-Rf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:33:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ken Brown Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13112 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13112-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13112.135491597019383 (code B ref 13112); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13112) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2012 21:32:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59376 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Th5XM-00052Z-QQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:32:49 -0500 Original-Received: from limestone8.mail.cornell.edu ([128.253.83.168]:34018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Th5XK-00052S-WB for 13112@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:32:48 -0500 X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Original-Received: from soapstone1.mail.cornell.edu (soapstone1.mail.cornell.edu [128.253.83.143]) by limestone8.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB7LWPLk020484; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:32:25 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (granite2.mail.cornell.edu [128.253.83.142]) by soapstone1.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB7LWUtx003643; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:32:30 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-67-249-194-47.twcny.res.rr.com [67.249.194.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qB7LWNbE024787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Dec 2012 16:32:24 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: <87boe5iscr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> X-PMX-CORNELL-SPAM-CHECKED: Pawpaw X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.395186, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.12.7.211819 X-Original-Sender: kbrown@cornell.edu - Fri Dec 7 16:32:24 2012 X-PMX-CORNELL-REASON: CU_White_List_Override X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68141 Archived-At: On 12/7/2012 2:18 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Glenn Morris writes: >> Maybe you could summarize what the actual problem is, then. > > The problem, as far as I have been able to determine, is that my init > file set a default font that does only exist in X11 but not Windows, so > it was illegal for the cygw32 build, but somehow that managed to sneak > past Emacs' guards and apparently activated X11 code paths that should > not have been in there to begin with. This then made Emacs hang > whenever it should display UI dialogs (like the file chooser). > > Interestingly if dbus was started then somehow everything kept working > (I had to manually switch the font from the first in the list, which > happened to be Arial, to something fixed-width). If I remove the > default font customization in my .emacs or arrange for that font to be a > Windows font (or simply start "emacs -Q"), then it does not matter > whether or not dbus has been started, so I'd say it is a red herring as > far as this bug report is concerned. > > I'm using the test version that Ken has provided, so I can't answer any > questions on how the build has been configured. The configure options can be seen in my original bug report. It turns out that I must have done something stupid when I claimed that HAVE_GSETTINGS and HAVE_GCONF were defined. I can no longer reproduce that, so Glenn is right. At this point I don't know whether or not there is an emacs bug here. I'm sorry for the confusion I caused. So let's start from scratch. Can you give a detailed, step-by-step procedure for reproducing the problem? I'd like to see if I can reproduce it. Ken