From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11939: 24.1; `save-buffers-kill-emacs' loses minibuffer focus when itcalls `list-processes' Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:04:35 +0200 Message-ID: <506E8683.30008@gmx.at> References: <50476203.8090503@gmx.at> <3E32A24D52324067986D05701BF1103A@us.oracle.com> <0624342AFA2B4430B3116DC5891ED2B0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349420713 23719 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2012 07:05:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 07:05:13 +0000 (UTC) To: 11939-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 05 09:05:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1yE-0004tN-H1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:05:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51154 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1y8-0004TZ-Hh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1y1-0004IQ-3Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1xu-0006JX-79 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1xu-0006JM-2j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:04:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1y2-0000n9-Rx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:05:02 -0400 Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 11939 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 11939@debbugs.gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at Original-Received: via spool by 11939-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D11939.13494206923026 (code D ref 11939); Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11939-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Oct 2012 07:04:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1xs-0000ml-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:04:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:44872) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TK1xq-0000mY-QT for 11939-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 03:04:51 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Oct 2012 07:04:35 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-57-32.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.57.32]) [62.47.57.32] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 05 Oct 2012 09:04:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/oCdwFfnbo3cnQrrmpafv3v9X+9s7jIBcfuP2RH5 KHK5JuZ4PQ/dP3 In-Reply-To: <0624342AFA2B4430B3116DC5891ED2B0@us.oracle.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65220 Archived-At: > There was a lot in this thread. But I at least checked that the original > problem reported (for the popup question about active processes) is fixed. It > is. Thx. OK. Closing this as well. Thanks, martin