From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12419: Mouse click changes layout Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:44:43 +0200 Message-ID: <506306CB.1090403@gmx.at> References: <504FB55D.5030405@t-online.de> <5050432C.4060203@gmx.at> <5052450F.8030001@t-online.de> <5052F242.4060303@gmx.at> <5055D769.1060804@t-online.de> <50561046.60902@gmx.at> <505E1FB6.1050504@t-online.de> <505ED4AB.7070009@gmx.at> <505F8576.8070902@t-online.de> <50601715.6030108@gmx.at> <833927jxrx.fsf@gnu.org> <5061802C.1070600@gmx.at> <834nmmi9sq.fsf@gnu.org> <5061BBD7.8070009@gmx.at> <83ehlpgpn9.fsf@gnu.org> <5062E0ED.3050901@gmx.at> <83a9wdgfri.fsf@gnu.org> <5062F86A.4060502@gmx.at> <838vbwhqjx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348667125 16304 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2012 13:45:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: occitan@esperanto.org, 12419@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 15:45:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrvd-0006fX-2y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:45:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33543 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrvY-0008Ic-39 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:45:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrvQ-0008Hw-Cs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrvF-0005uB-33 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrvE-0005sq-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrvC-0000JY-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12419 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12419-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12419.13486670921178 (code B ref 12419); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12419) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2012 13:44:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrv2-0000Iw-0z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:44:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:57644) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGruy-0000Im-C7 for 12419@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:44:50 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2012 13:44:48 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-46-104.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.46.104]) [62.47.46.104] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 26 Sep 2012 15:44:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Yzdgx77iYia0cnAdkBSkj9zOxvxX79sUVNK7VjI UTW0okcX+AaMIH In-Reply-To: <838vbwhqjx.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64920 Archived-At: >> In this case the TTY equivalent would display (6, 5) lines. > > Yes. Is that a problem? Not principally. At least nothing we should care about initially. > pos-visible-in-window-p can still tell > whether the resize reached its goal of exposing the text you want, no? I didn't care about `pos-visible-in-window-p' in this example. > I think the loop isn't needed for the application you have in mind. > But if it is, can you show a concrete use case where just using that > function gives bad results for measuring pixel distance between buffer > positions? I didn't write that loop (IIRC Kenichi Handa wrote it). The sheer presence of it however seems to indicate that `pos-visible-in-window-p' might have given an off-by-one-line answer when `point' is on the last line of a window, at least back in 2000. Maybe this a non-issue now. martin