From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:48:07 +0200 Message-ID: <5062C147.2080600@gmx.at> References: <87r63gzcap.fsf@jurta.org> <505DBC23.5040907@gmx.at> <87y5k1lhn6.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <505ED4BB.3030103@gmx.at> <87txunj0ej.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <50602A8D.6010203@gmx.at> <87y5jxfp79.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348649364 23371 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2012 08:49:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1806@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 10:49:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnJ6-0001O1-Nd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:49:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45117 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnJ1-0007Vj-NZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnIu-0007VX-12 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnIo-0001XW-82 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46775) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnIo-0001XS-4Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnIk-00019W-PV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:49:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1806 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1806-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1806.13486492924365 (code B ref 1806); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1806) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2012 08:48:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56318 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnHv-00018M-Ls for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:48:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:54087) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TGnHt-00018E-N8 for 1806@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2012 08:48:10 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-47-61.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.47.61]) [62.47.47.61] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 26 Sep 2012 10:48:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/r39UiMSnrY5lDxOEqro+YTSV7O2JrZWXn9QzbOe JRbzknPwvJNYv5 In-Reply-To: <87y5jxfp79.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64908 Archived-At: >> Note that I have added an option `temp-buffer-resize-regexps' which can >> be used to turn off resizing in selected buffers. > > What is the rationale for this change? I can't find any discussion > about this on emacs-devel or the bug list, but maybe I missed it. The problem has been discussed in the thread for bug#1806 and in a thread you started about window shrinking via VC-diff. There it has been asked for a way to switch off auto-resizing. My rationale is to do all `fit-window-to-buffer' stuff under `temp-buffer-resize-mode' and allow tweaking this in a uniform manner for individual buffers. > I'm not enthusiastic about the existence of temp-buffer-resize-mode in > the first place. It's a bad concept, since it creates a difference > between "temporary buffers" and other kinds of buffers displayed via > display-buffer. Then we probably should change that concept. My intention was to fit windows even when `display-buffer' is not called. For example, after certain changes of the buffer contents, without asking for a redisplay via `display-buffer'. > But there are no guidelines for when such a difference > should exist. So adding more knobs onto temp-buffer-resize-mode is a > step in the wrong direction, IMO. I have no opinion on this and can do whatever people want. But bug#1806 should be eventually closed in some way. martin