From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12419: Mouse click changes layout Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:16:24 +0200 Message-ID: <50534A48.5080805@gmx.at> References: <504FB55D.5030405@t-online.de> <5050432C.4060203@gmx.at> <5052450F.8030001@t-online.de> <5052F242.4060303@gmx.at> <83a9wsvqk6.fsf@gnu.org> <50533344.2030000@gmx.at> <831ui4veny.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347635833 317 80.91.229.3 (14 Sep 2012 15:17:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: occitan@esperanto.org, 12419@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 14 17:17:16 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXdr-0003PL-VD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:17:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39634 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXdo-0000Iz-3i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47047) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXdk-0000Ir-OD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXdg-0004VJ-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXdg-0004VD-Hr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXeb-0003QH-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12419 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12419-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12419.134763585213117 (code B ref 12419); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12419) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2012 15:17:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXe7-0003PW-FR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:17:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:40529) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXe4-0003PK-Uv for 12419@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:17:29 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2012 15:16:30 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-46-61.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.46.61]) [62.47.46.61] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 14 Sep 2012 17:16:30 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+OUOgmBfmO5O+cnumZ+zmnrxY2/QFpjdI8SshEFb jbFyMMvjxYvtXx In-Reply-To: <831ui4veny.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64288 Archived-At: > Wouldn't using the "asymmetric" resizing do the job here? I don't > think the symmetric variant is ever TRT when triggered by resizing the > minibuffer window. Asymmetric resizing doesn't size back correctly when any window but a bottommost one gets resized while enlarging the minibuffer window. the idea of asymmetric dragging is that in a configuration like this ------------ | | | | ------------ | | | | ------------ | | | | ------------ you drag the lower divider up you first get ------------ | | | | ------------ | | ------------ | | | | | | ------------ and then ------------ | | ------------ | | ------------ | | | | | | | | ------------ because the idea is that you want to show more in the bottom window. When you now drag the same divider back you get ------------ | | ------------ | | | | ------------ | | | | | | ------------ because the idea is to show more of the middle window and then ------------ | | ------------ | | | | | | ------------ | | | | ------------ which is not the initial configuration. martin