From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12419: Mouse click changes layout Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:08:14 +0200 Message-ID: <5053485E.70801@gmx.at> References: <504FB55D.5030405@t-online.de> <5050432C.4060203@gmx.at><5052450F.8030001@t-online.de> <5052F242.4060303@gmx.at><83a9wsvqk6.fsf@gnu.org> <50533344.2030000@gmx.at> <1455E2776C3F46FCB324B5562F718569@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347635364 28381 80.91.229.3 (14 Sep 2012 15:09:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: occitan@esperanto.org, 12419@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 14 17:09:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXWH-0006Ov-U7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:09:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36125 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXWE-0005nl-0p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXW2-0005WP-0b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXVw-0001Kh-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXVw-0001Kb-2t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXWr-0003Eb-IC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12419 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12419-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12419.134763536212381 (code B ref 12419); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12419) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2012 15:09:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXWE-0003Dd-3y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:60033) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXWC-0003DW-Cl for 12419@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2012 15:08:21 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-46-61.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.46.61]) [62.47.46.61] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 14 Sep 2012 17:08:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19h7CVqSINhdMCF586NsjIbszXl+V5DNFRwfYTcOn /LZOSKNTDLc2Dk In-Reply-To: <1455E2776C3F46FCB324B5562F718569@us.oracle.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64287 Archived-At: > Sounds reasonable. But shouldn't it be a user choice (e.g. option)? What if a > user wants some particular window's height (or width) to stay the same (assuming > there is enough space), while s?he changes the frame height (or width)? > > Perhaps something akin to window dedication, to indicate that, as much as > possible, you want to keep the height or width of a particular window. You can set `window-size-fixed' in that buffer. > Or perhaps we could optionally let users keep just the selected window the same > size (as much as possible), when resizing the frame. That would perhaps be > simpler than the suggestion above. That's problematic when the same buffer is shown in two different windows. >> When dragging a divider, windows are resized asymmetrically, >> that is we enlarge only the window we drag away from and >> shrink the windows on the other side. > > That sounds normal, but what is the alternative - how could it be otherwise? That all windows on the other side get resized proportionally. >> Asymmetric resizing is not reversible, that is, dragging the >> divider back by the same amount will not necessarily reproduce the >> inital configuration. > > I don't think that is what I see. But I guess I don't understand what you're > saying. Can you give an example, and contrast what happens in earlier Emacs > releases? Try with three windows above each other and drag one modeline until both windows in the direction you drag to are at their minimum height. Then drag the divider back. The outermost window is not sized back. Now set `resize-mini-windows' to nil and drag the bottom modeline. All windows get resized proportionally in both directions. In Emacs 23.3 automatically resizing the minibuffer resizes the lowest window first. That's what people want. But IIRC this doesn't work with `resize-mini-windows' t and `resize-mini-windows' nil doesn't work when the lowest window is at its minimum height. martin