From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David E Sigeti Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Version 21 too slow remotely Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 14:14:14 -0600 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020701130721.01cba670@x-mail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025554297 11472 127.0.0.1 (1 Jul 2002 20:11:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 20:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17P7WL-0002yp-00 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2002 22:11:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17P7Wo-0002CT-00; Mon, 01 Jul 2002 16:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay1.lanl.gov ([128.165.4.101]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17P7UQ-00024c-00 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2002 16:09:38 -0400 Original-Received: from x-mail.lanl.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay1.lanl.gov (8.11.6/8.11.6/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id g61K9M625640; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:09:22 -0600 Original-Received: from reinhold.lanl.gov (reinhold.lanl.gov [128.165.116.129]) by x-mail.lanl.gov (8.11.6/8.11.6/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id g61K9JD10178; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:09:19 -0600 X-Sender: sigeti@x-mail.lanl.gov X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Original-To: Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:2376 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:2376 Dear Emacs Folks, I run Emacs remotely (displaying on my local X server). I have found version 21 to be unusably slow. I have not had this problem with version 20. I don't know if you test performance when running remotely so I thought you would like to know about this problem. Yours, David --- Dr. David E. Sigeti Phone: 505-667-9239 E-mail: sigeti@lanl.gov Surface mail: MS-F645, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA