From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48135: 27.1.91; standard-display-table incorrectly initialized in byte compiled code? Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 12:22:46 +0000 Message-ID: <4edb143526eb8fb54098@heytings.org> References: <835z02adnw.fsf@gnu.org> <4edb14352660e56af8c0@heytings.org> <8335v6abt8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40677"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ndw@nwalsh.com, 48135@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 01 14:23:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcoeR-000ATf-E4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 14:23:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35170 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcoeP-0001CT-Cg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 08:23:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcoeE-0001CJ-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 08:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcoeE-0001A2-J3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 08:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcoeE-0004xw-Do for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 08:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 12:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48135 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48135-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48135.161987177019063 (code B ref 48135); Sat, 01 May 2021 12:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48135) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 12:22:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36338 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcoe2-0004xP-3T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 08:22:50 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:32824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcodz-0004xJ-Px for 48135@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 08:22:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1619871766; bh=F6epSUvZpQY7p3eNFkqTSH5BOzherKhMSUXvuTQBLFM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=moYbrJF0x6uvtWZQY3sF08sa0CJW45hK/9Hif6R4FMOGmRzr/4nbs0a4T5HzvOu4u BjlKhrcIDP6qNGOc3qFXp2O5jaAVDjdBlgWtO57rgyqi92tbnrbM9E1/yT5vdXp3x2 kDxQrGRKfidvVIkZ0i8R/LUv9VlcV/vxoLciLeGwCaD2gyHc2ExNgdw964uP/VUP32 YaJ8ZQKpDrujB+kXad8saxAtJOUKNMj97FjEIM5rXEEwPVclsk+2/hYGXNXvplIgQY tCKoOfsgJB9/LzVmHWQlaI0nrEqqUkUWLzDdyVt1s8xZL2uXigJB+Yd88sxLhTsEtz a2qKgrnbHpSqQ== In-Reply-To: <8335v6abt8.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205342 Archived-At: >> A simple workaround is to (require 'disp-table). > > Why isn't that a solution? IOW, why not request that code which does > this needs to require disp-table? > Yes, I said "workaround", I could have said "solution" ;-) It makes sense indeed to request a require disp-table in such cases, but OTOH I understand that seeing byte-compiled code behaving differently from the non-byte-compiled one is surprising.