From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48117: 28.0.50; Update of loaddefs.el during normal build is unreliable Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 08:09:42 +0000 Message-ID: <4edb1435266f8ca80b73@heytings.org> References: <8335v8c7o0.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf8zbyr8.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6pfbw3s.fsf@gnu.org> <83tunna9dt.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1ira8rs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19490"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 01 10:10:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lckhY-0004xU-3B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 10:10:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lckhW-0007mD-Ua for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:10:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lckhO-0007lm-DF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lckhO-0004gC-5T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lckhO-000449-0R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 08:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48117.161985658415601 (code B ref 48117); Sat, 01 May 2021 08:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 08:09:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60221 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lckh6-00043Z-BQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:60796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lckh5-00043R-9u for 48117@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:09:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1619856582; bh=3fygl6c3j4/qL/Aq375bcN7oBN3EDWwsVih4s+HEFh0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=YTcX0lJZ3XB0xsWaBh5hWyoGsCPSf8n/8p+maR7P4yB0+TtvrjerfdcsG8wiQ1jjp FeGkb6AqltISJ6ShpFxOh61xChlYnKkhhdiPNYtt5CDDSnhmtiOS872ZqCe06EuA/D viN2ajWfAF7h14FYwF6S51sD6Zu49tucTnSO6Em0ic2zFpre30RhFgRAmdLEdS0gXD BqbfvUN5hqlKbxap+wXV269j768zB0tUPUjciRSAH+KSKXUUxvkcq/8RDilOZTuo6x LHNycFu+oTJzADGT1mepPoy+zI3XMM8kB5m0X8/odTsYixvPN+nQxB9mSrO17mVvvo J5wg2T65S7VNw== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205321 Archived-At: >> I think this should preferably be automated. The current ldefs-boot.el >> file in the trunk is 25 days old, running admin/update_autogen -L adds >> 247 lines and modifies 100 lines. > > It gets automaticallly updated on the first of the month. It could be > more frequent, but it would seem like churn for no real reason most of > the time. > IMO once a week would be better. An outdated ldefs-boot creates unnecessary warnings during the build. > > (It wouldn't make any difference to the issue that prompted this > report.) > That depends on the chosen solution. You suggested copying ldefs-boot.el onto loaddefs.el when it is more recent. I'm not entirely sure, but it seems to me that forcing a regeneration of the loaddefs files during make whenever ldefs-boot.el is more recent than loaddefs.el would be a better solution.