From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rameiko87@posteo.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69738: Followup Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:15:55 +0000 Message-ID: <4d7b2d2317ad9512628fbd2725f33d8b@posteo.net> References: <4a0215b2e7bb416cf352e867183f745a@posteo.net> <1ed9ea789788d6a6450c86920199b6c6@posteo.net> <8634ronurh.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk6bnbzl.fsf@gnu.org> <867cgzn5jw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22660"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69738@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 15 12:17:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rwJPF-0005j8-EG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:17:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwJOd-0000TB-Lw; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwJOR-0000PS-Cr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:16:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rwJON-0004u6-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:16:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rwJOY-0000ha-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: rameiko87@posteo.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69738.171317617831770 (code B ref 69738); Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2024 10:16:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rwJNo-0008FH-J5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:16:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:58905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rwJNl-00085R-5g for 69738@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:16:14 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF56B240103 for <69738@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:15:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1713176155; bh=g7Ku4cR9ITtnI9DUhe1LhsZM5y9XHObkQk5+wTZHpn0=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To: Cc:Subject:Message-ID:From; b=SeEBY4Rvu+p3fRVf/MdKiN556SU8/TPb1XCKZ5pRK3kpkKNp5kJbNTG5TTQcG4K9O 0VjUE9C1fKUTYzFo+jmYdezXE98r/sRqByHZ/d4oQOcP/AzJ+zq9Ta/yZnSOfPOrQK hYhWWGq5sC/ZSRytRgRerSebU25wEBBv5IZZap+/SrLO/KarClLRG79izyhk5pL0NV RVnEd9o90IZsKixVx3I7a42Ccr10Ye2TG0kwZKj5p8YmnrcsHTkvrJq8NP/YhJ0PVx pFpqy4ozMDJOr95jgbe/KXrLmn3bNkhGvE4+x636k/aceSkBeq9IMSroVUddY2HOx1 5dDyZp/FwQ+xQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VJ33H24L7z6tw4; Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:15:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <867cgzn5jw.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:283352 Archived-At: > So please show a minimal > recipe for reproducing this, after applying the patch I sent, and > starting from "emacs -Q -nw". There's probably something I'm missing. emacs -nw -Q (FRAME 1 IS SCRATCH) C-x 5 2 M-x load-file PATCH M-x rmail (FRAME 2 IS RMAIL) M-: (setq rmail-mail-new-frame t) C-x 5 2 C-x b *Messages* (FRAME 3 IS MESSAGES) C-x 5 o (BACK TO FRAME 2) m (NEW MAIL OPENS ON FRAME 4) C-u - C-x 5 o (THIS IS WHAT THE PATCH DOES, REVERTING BACK TO FRAME 1 WHICH IS SCRATCH AND NOT RMAIL) Does it make sense? Curiously, replacing the last line by C-c C-k kills the draft but doesn't change the frame (note that I applied the patch). I deduce that rmail-mail-return is not called by C-c C-k... Am I doing something wrong?