From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39379: 27.0.60; Fix for #38457 broke ido-vertical-mode Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 20:24:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4ba1b95e-85e0-0516-1c0b-c6ae26cc8200@yandex.ru> References: <83a762k9p2.fsf@gnu.org> <71c2898c-aca7-ea92-e7d2-f4fd122b566d@gmail.com> <83ftfthsqs.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0awj42l.fsf@gnu.org> <83a760j23r.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhdqbg6v.fsf@gnu.org> <42a997dd-0667-da4d-7605-aa8267018869@yandex.ru> <83pnejr7nq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="124669"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: 39379@debbugs.gnu.org, wyuenho@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 12 19:25:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j1whE-000WHW-S3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:25:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1whD-00045J-NF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1wh5-000452-M8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:25:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1wh4-0000oz-NX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1wh4-0000os-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j1wh4-0007Sz-H4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39379 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39379-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39379.158153189128681 (code B ref 39379); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39379) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2020 18:24:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j1wgt-0007SX-9t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:24:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com ([209.85.221.51]:35741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j1wgr-0007SK-AH for 39379@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:24:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id w12so3604344wrt.2 for <39379@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:24:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6nVNLTYkJ6EKVqqAb5FKjKpSnt2Arv96JExT2ulg6HQ=; b=Wfzr9Hbvs8yShy9VtH2XxNpor6INKMs6zggxp7FhjkeYDcnDXbjaRyD1Oq6pjnl04i 0LgXAykQE6l+AYM5+MgISuef+e6L3Tq3yLf9uTY4Qa8jOopIWDJ+Q8fHOBlyh43X3soT JgJYpSvDnoowpKDxmruU812qBDK21dOYCLkQz9uG/z9VrApprYb3DmPC029EPirthYLz Ujx7Mr/YunegU4aLRSPuVkXenjVzPA7EsiIsfkgjWvgIme+/jXFtJnxxjrMitgxu2Hy0 QEu8YwqINxo+Qo2f+MUnpE2r3TCkjqsUu/fj6In/Fv0NKvmPmLdFD7xEcPVs/WbXDIv/ XCXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6nVNLTYkJ6EKVqqAb5FKjKpSnt2Arv96JExT2ulg6HQ=; b=bNmcFmshiZeNHufUV1DG867DWcTXLg+ZBCsgY3JzF822sB+8U7uQsswECUZf/AYnzQ bZvaUY9bEw3KM7t6sPnYTcOXmEgSMSGNkAkxJBQdGeNMWCorCvgmMjZI1gRIUd5K0O37 9qXWsRsBhiz08nhzfdBdxDWZmJ1CVf8SOf8AliLeNrb4nDdq9QtqwBwxImP406hvgl5S X5PwzMEMD97nz+PsXiCnuLUiR3d6Pu/vkeoukGy0NS2f+thELgmUHNZuz09YDIwKCsIQ FuFBEMINWCig4rHRroabzERtDeyMd1Z+lGsqAr/GNkfYajd/LYMRJKuaRtH5LOBeWhZG 4jnA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/ZtmnrYVOKNGErx44+F4y070bwYL/nXu+zhwjIvWrzum8nqIL Vm1tiiJz/Ui7UycAFivwp+I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzqmKeSA4dXvjsyUN4krQeoQgzHeSFVJCk6ue8c50R213aMAhGre9fCMSDJ9PIqHf5Oc/x59Q== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ee01:: with SMTP id y1mr17544250wrn.152.1581531883294; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:24:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e18sm1500895wrw.70.2020.02.12.10.24.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:24:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83pnejr7nq.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175975 Archived-At: On 12.02.2020 20:18, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > OK, but this is an old problem, because I see the same in Emacs 26.3. > It wasn't caused by the new implementation of set-minibuffer-message. True. > Well, we hardly ever fix future bugs. And limiting mini-windows to > such small height is asking for trouble. I don't know the reason why the user who reported this problem did it, but they *did* find a need to set ido-max-window-height to 1, apparently (which has the same effect). TBH, of course, I'm more worried about the "future bug" regarding icomplete-vertical-mode. But maybe we'll switch to child frames exclusively for this purpose by them. > But okay, I'm fine with leaving this bug open, and will try to fix the > problem on master. I do want to install the patch below, because it > fixes a problem directly caused by set-minibuffer-message, so we > should fix this in Emacs 27. Any objections? None from me. If that's the simplest fix we can do for the release, please go ahead.