From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19853: Acknowledgement (25.0.50; ElDoc is displayed whether eldoc-mode is enabled or not) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:25:11 +0200 Message-ID: <4b554a3b-bc21-859e-4cfc-3c82901ea32f@yandex.ru> References: <864mqqgh3j.fsf@yandex.ru> <55AE4DA2.1060505@yandex.ru> <87wpoxko2a.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458498383 28586 80.91.229.3 (20 Mar 2016 18:26:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 18:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19853@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 20 19:26:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ahi3H-0008Bu-In for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:26:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53975 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahi3G-00067i-To for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahi3D-00067Q-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahi38-0003ew-6o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahi38-0003es-2G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ahi37-0002Cr-TO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 18:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19853 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19853-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19853.14584983288437 (code B ref 19853); Sun, 20 Mar 2016 18:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19853) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2016 18:25:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ahi2a-0002C1-6U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:25:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:35670) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ahi2Y-0002Bl-Or for 19853@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:25:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l68so85614926wml.0 for <19853@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qsiXMJScOwHaMICuL3RSbnls3uXuK+L1ZfvFxUD2eYA=; b=BecJcMX9YZZMbkOekGHAc6PhuFrJQS36MHh0uqfabTWYy+Nv8SFxSNoANSgeoQTf0h 0uxwngSh2IKtTxEI8+sjvDPpDgk/QZ64twgtfQgdEt44dkRi489WNCfmaUKrtM+OWXGJ CDNmSn26KxZT0G93XaDgkZzuCqWVB0Hb/BAg/wR30aptN2EwGbbarnV9nAnZQ7K+777b SSHbvFRisyyqP4qvpmyriCV9YFGmJnW80ODqpsaMk6+A+hfefoGlaBYkhSPE7ORz/qXM 52UVx4kcRpO65UzCgwxPQoKL0y9CSAYy3RMomMF37KQKAAfzdGRgPWJowypITHnxQ7++ jzpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qsiXMJScOwHaMICuL3RSbnls3uXuK+L1ZfvFxUD2eYA=; b=eE+xpUINL88enDRKIn4gm5E3mwy86peW5Kg/jzRqYlX0pc5vnwkQdV+y0RES95FgI4 tihNe/vfOpqQQncRQW5RYifRuCYpeeFJxJ4BpeNnQDR6ieEyYLSf0ttEJvkG2FVwjmic AspN8baMuTar6ObiFIitEbKM0aOWTO45MDptKXa2TXUEcnPQV7bdQBQIYcSaFS0sszr4 B3NVjlludC/nZU3eOEE5z6aY0Y4WJDewPQgjaFlIvLO9HYdeXJS7sekwa2PeNameIdF7 YRgk5ZSdR/S3q83wBl03ny/D51iZi54B/iRml3RKuO99DVSQxHvOl3di49aj+SpZV+4h gc7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKi6/TKFDTVgIbFE7imf12ikDVJsS5JauId5+dxCqGop9mgCY8lyTh4hwpt1fEKVQ== X-Received: by 10.194.176.129 with SMTP id ci1mr11258322wjc.166.1458498321078; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id cb2sm21805216wjc.16.2016.03.20.11.25.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:25:20 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <87wpoxko2a.fsf@web.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:115162 Archived-At: On 03/20/2016 08:21 PM, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > I think it's simpler that way: `global-eldoc-mode' adds its stuff to the > global hook bindings. Thus toggling the global mode has an instant > effect on all buffers. The globalized local eldoc mode would only have > an effect in new buffers or after changing the major mode. That's not true: turning off a globalized mode turns off the related minor mode in all buffers. So, instant effect as well. The current implementation, however, is not "simpler": both modes set up hooks. For some reasons, they also do that in slightly different ways. > What exactly is this bug report about (this question, or the statement > in the subject, for which you didn't provide a recipe)? I did provide a recipe, in the bug description.