From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39379: 27.0.60; Fix for #38457 broke ido-vertical-mode Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 00:51:49 +0300 Message-ID: <4b167bc3-0240-cb51-a004-6d9e1a84d0a4@yandex.ru> References: <83a762k9p2.fsf@gnu.org> <71c2898c-aca7-ea92-e7d2-f4fd122b566d@gmail.com> <83ftfthsqs.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0awj42l.fsf@gnu.org> <83a760j23r.fsf@gnu.org> <838slkj0mk.fsf@gnu.org> <17d792bd-c96f-0440-7127-5308cc34f158@gmail.com> <83y2tjhe6l.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="34241"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: 39379@debbugs.gnu.org, wyuenho@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 03 22:52:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iyjdd-0008ma-4k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 22:52:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47670 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iyjdc-000083-1Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:52:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iyjdU-00007x-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iyjdT-0001Rk-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:52:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iyjdS-0001Q7-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iyjdR-0002Ss-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39379 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39379-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39379.15807667219467 (code B ref 39379); Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39379) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2020 21:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42285 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iyjdQ-0002Sd-Bw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:52:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com ([209.85.208.172]:41997) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iyjdO-0002SP-A1 for 39379@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 16:51:58 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d10so16276620ljl.9 for <39379@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:51:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z6MdS0CwQ3GE7JW8Dcz011ucfy3KSsr+fzvf3lWWs28=; b=UOvsq/FxvGcX4PzpIGNzULYbk0XogImlIY/6pSOQE0Drn6xG4A05B2uv//0aRDe1gt P7fqMah5+oLBFVtoT7GsnStLXGYggki7aLMjLwAUjQl04y3ZiNhUPvM+2BGp0SYCpTNW MnHDrg3KEyUELN7dcLyjvmksK3HMnbpJ4swlEFYNBNov+/ruzZCft1BVpnUQAVDFnxfa HgZT0v0/Mm5JjeyEZg3OKKY8fwWf1NLqQiqPxPfLvmrF2UjHGeuelmsiLZgvZcCGwDBC 5lGU1bVQWk72u6vzkV4oituYMRLft4VowowzMeir/1TBbAEBsLhPYIEO2XgZbpVZTWGv zihA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z6MdS0CwQ3GE7JW8Dcz011ucfy3KSsr+fzvf3lWWs28=; b=D+Jir5DiLnh91uOy/NN+7zjgG6gx5BW+MdDP0KJKWJ/JYQfJM2obC/oPC4tsDTFjuT fDbLbHcLHpJPmlUzlR/hkL5sCrfLnZxCl8Yj8nAxrRqfsvlCivu7l9khhXWtTv3t2IKb g3/L5UB69KL2ajKrI91ZJ5j+8cS7MwQB9KjX2E+hHUKAt5JPAlcIwFXHSWAeMrrLeCce cffOe9kpiUZTI9o6cZ9I9CHoCXtEz6IteHN1MAFtja/sI8SpDnmjVxyMzgKJM2Gde/z7 HlfhELzOI/CyVSGCybVESFq44eqlkgB0GshAjD5EMMIYBeIALvPTW0e/30JO3NdZxGrB NebQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX3fCRui6wY5kyl4SDdkte8OS7clH7GIhByohGyPI1Qu+l4IzRL fpa7mhiTOdg9zZFNgUigr+M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHPi9RiZfmMvz5AuvU6fK5BtDnt1TQe8v3D5M2+y2MsqcrXd5n6oI2PqlobLXPa4ZyeTCJHw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b5b4:: with SMTP id f20mr15407868ljn.112.1580766712251; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:51:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a11sm9531102lfb.34.2020.02.03.13.51.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:51:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83y2tjhe6l.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175653 Archived-At: On 03.02.2020 18:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I've suggested a workaround for that in the GitHub issue commends as >> soon as you opened this bug report (2 days ago). > > That's exactly the solution I had in mind. I suggest that you push it > to the Emacs Git repository without waiting for the solution of the > larger issue (which will take me some time to design and test). Not for us to do, it's a change to be done in ido-vertical-mode, not in ido.el (they override a built-in function). > Btw, the reason you didn't see the problem is that the list of > candidates in your case was very small. That's what the workaround > with ido-max-prospects <= 7 does when the list is longer. Yes, I saw that later. :-(