From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christian Ohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11218: with-demoted-errors use of condition-case-unless-debug; ert Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:30:58 -0700 Message-ID: <4F8DE112.5010106@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334699100 17374 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2012 21:45:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11218@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 17 23:44:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKGCp-0002MN-21 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:44:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35662 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKGCo-0002ub-Fk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:44:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54783) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKGCl-0002uV-Nw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKGCj-0008Or-Ul for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:44:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKGCj-0008Lg-QY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:44:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKGCs-0000M9-HS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christian Ohler Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11218 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11218-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11218.13346990821328 (code B ref 11218); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11218) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2012 21:44:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38796 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKGCW-0000LK-FD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:44:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54585 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKFzU-0008TO-Rt for 11218@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [2620:0:1002:1009:e2f8:47ff:fe38:3bc8] (port=56155 helo=dhcp-172-31-155-154.sfo.corp.google.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKFzJ-0001nK-Ek; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:31:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:44:39 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59183 Archived-At: On 4/13/12 6:44 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>>> If you replace with-demoted-errors with ignore-errors, the test passes. >>> Looks like a bug in ERT. >> I don't know if it's a "bug" per se... >> ert--run-test-internal binds debug-on-error to t, and redefines the >> debugger to ert--run-test-debugger. As the doc of that function says: > > I wonder why ERT doesn't just use condition-case to catch and record > the errors. Two reasons that I remember off the top of my head: Recording backtraces, and recording additional information provided with `ert-info'. Using condition-case would let ERT regain control only after the stack is unwound, at which point that information is gone. Christian.