From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11242: 24.1.50; Switching to rmai view buffer Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:15:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4F8BD53A.4090500@gmx.at> References: <4F89C750.9010508@gmx.at> <83aa2e15sn.fsf@gnu.org> <4F8A8351.40808@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334564177 26111 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2012 08:16:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11242@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 10:16:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SJh6d-0005gp-12 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:16:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55309 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJh6c-0006ia-9Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:16:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46015) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJh6U-0006iT-Fo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:16:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJh6P-0005gV-Ne for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SJh6P-0005gO-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SJh6Q-0006MD-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11242 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11242-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11242.133456415824428 (code B ref 11242); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11242) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2012 08:15:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SJh6L-0006Lw-Nr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:34274) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SJh6J-0006Lk-Qz for 11242@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2012 08:15:48 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-46-39.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.46.39]) [62.47.46.39] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 16 Apr 2012 10:15:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Yf3U7oxXYrw9EdQvQu9Ab5GHxTMnjQM4+LhbeJn 8TyTb6zwKReF8W In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59107 Archived-At: > which calls `mail-bury' where we have two options to show a buffer whose > name starts with a space, namely > > (defun mail-bury (&optional arg) > ... > (bury-buffer (current-buffer)) <---------- HERE > ... > (switch-to-buffer newbuf)))) <----------- OR HERE > > It's neither one. It's done by this code. > > ;; If there is an Rmail buffer, return to it nicely > ;; even if this message was not started by an Rmail command. > (unless return-action > (dolist (buffer (buffer-list)) > (if (eq (buffer-local-value 'major-mode buffer) 'rmail-mode) > (setq return-action `(rmail-mail-return ,newbuf))))) Maybe. But how can you be sure that `bury-buffer' has no effect? Do you have a buffer in rmail-mode at that time? Is `rmail-mail-return' definitely called? Is NEWBUF really a buffer starting with a space? martin