From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10539: 24.0.92; low display-time-interval makes Emacs slow Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:07:47 +0100 Message-ID: <4F23D703.4080202@gmx.at> References: <87zkdl93r0.fsf@web.de> <6162fwu92z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y5ssxlrx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327769634 16252 80.91.229.3 (28 Jan 2012 16:53:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 10539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 28 17:53:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrBXA-0006uH-5b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:53:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49318 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rr68s-0006LF-ON for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:08:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40283) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rr68q-0006LA-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:08:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rr68p-000387-AU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:08:20 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rr68p-000382-93 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:08:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rr69V-0002ZY-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10539.13277489409881 (code B ref 10539); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2012 11:09:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47572 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rr69T-0002ZK-Uz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:09:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:34033) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rr69S-0002Z7-BW for 10539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 06:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2012 11:08:08 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-59-112.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.59.112]) [62.47.59.112] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2012 12:08:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18IjMgl19sI9ERZJ4MIlO/byrX6nsqKX/35Z40Rqf G39FVbQo1R48Ou In-Reply-To: <83y5ssxlrx.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56120 Archived-At: > Would the following wording make it less confusing/contradictory? > > Force next redisplay cycle to update the current buffer's mode line A buffer doesn't have a mode or header line. And a body like (if all (with-current-buffer (other-buffer))) (set-buffer-modified-p (buffer-modified-p))) indicates that this function exclusively relies on obscure side effects which are not documented anywhere. martin