From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David De La Harpe Golden Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10313: configure fails to find include path on openbsd Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:54:41 +0000 Message-ID: <4F021991.7030100@harpegolden.net> References: <87y5ucvlg3.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <4EEBEF0C.4050604@cs.ucla.edu> <4EF549AC.3050104@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325537757 3693 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2012 20:55:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10313@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert , Manuel Giraud To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 02 21:55:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhov9-0004HE-JY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:55:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36501 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhov8-0006aK-OO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:55:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhov6-0006a4-6a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:55:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhov5-0003p5-7k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:55:48 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rhov5-0003p1-4p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:55:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhoyD-0006Lb-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:59:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: David De La Harpe Golden Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10313 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10313-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10313.132553788324327 (code B ref 10313); Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10313) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2012 20:58:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhoxG-0006KJ-BG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from harpegolden.net ([65.99.215.13]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RhoxD-0006Jw-Dk for 10313@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:58:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [87.198.47.210] (87-198-47-210.ptr.magnet.ie [87.198.47.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "David De La Harpe Golden", Issuer "David De La Harpe Golden Personal CA rev 3" (verified OK)) by harpegolden.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63437683D9; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:54:43 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:59:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55372 Archived-At: On 02/01/12 18:42, Glenn Morris wrote: > Though it seems odd to me to have a system where gcc does not look in > /usr/local, yet that is where packages get installed. Well, the meaning of "package" is maybe also a bit different: OpenBSD's much-vaunted security claims only apply [1] to its monolithic "system" (though note that includes a whole bunch of things that would be packages on a lot of other OSes, AFAIUI [2][3]) and _not_ the OpenBSD ports&packages. The latter are strictly add-ons that have not been subjected to the same security auditing, it's not like the debian situation, say, where the whole "system" is pretty much /made of/ packages (like the base-files .deb with the filesystem hierarchy itself...) So I guess the idea is to exclude them by default and require an active choice to use them, since once you start using the ports&packages system at all (never mind installing stuff direct from upstream sources...), you're choosing to break that assumption you're only running fully openbsd project audited code. [1] http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#Intro """ The packages and ports collection does NOT go through the same thorough security audit that is performed on the OpenBSD base system. Although we strive to keep the quality of the packages collection high, we just do not have enough human resources to ensure the same level of robustness and security. """ [2] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/ [3] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/