From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10186: 23.3; save-some-buffers not making review windows large enough Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:33:43 +0100 Message-ID: <4EF4AD67.2020203@gmx.at> References: <4ED892A1.9010109@gmx.at> <4ED8D8F1.9070307@gmx.at> <4ED8FAB5.3050306@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324658095 18191 80.91.229.12 (23 Dec 2011 16:34:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10186@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dave Abrahams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 23 17:34:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Re853-0003JY-Ks for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:34:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50175 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Re853-0002Et-8e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:34:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Re850-0002Ei-EZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:34:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Re84z-0004Zg-Hz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:34:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Re84z-0004ZX-GP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:34:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Re87B-00059q-Gc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10186 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10186-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10186.132465816519748 (code B ref 10186); Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10186) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2011 16:36:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Re86G-00058S-N7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Re86E-000582-5O for 10186@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2011 16:33:44 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-59-176.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.59.176]) [62.47.59.176] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 23 Dec 2011 17:33:44 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18jXTkXZyIj1baQZw9hAWOeh4M+VH0/5tYM8qhxdq dB0wP4iv28YDHV User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:37:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55140 Archived-At: > ... but I still don't > understand: what about this problem is specific to my setup? Nothing, actually. What I wanted to say is that working with small windows runs the risk that `display-buffer' will reuse such a window. As Juri said we should be able to customize this. But I don't like the idea of a global variable and I don't think that using the ALIST argument for this purpose is feasible either. It's something I planned to solve with the help of specifiers once ... martin