From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10296: 24.0.92; check_glyph_memory still aborting Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:46:51 +0100 Message-ID: <4EE87E9B.1000103@gmx.at> References: <4EE8548C.9030901@gmx.at> <4EE86F70.1000105@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323859675 23884 80.91.229.12 (14 Dec 2011 10:47:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 14 11:47:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RamNK-0005At-S7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:47:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RamNK-0003iI-Fr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:47:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34533) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RamNE-0003hx-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:47:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RamN8-0000wY-OJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:47:44 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RamN8-0000wP-Mq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:47:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RamOT-0007Zu-Io for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:49:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10296.132385970029059 (code B ref 10296); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2011 10:48:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RamNo-0007Ye-0S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:48:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RamNl-0007YX-MS for 10296@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:48:18 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2011 10:46:52 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-43-146.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.43.146]) [62.47.43.146] by mail.gmx.net (mp060) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2011 11:46:52 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+MZJADKzyMAHlbP2+WKfH/CnFyHJA6WskLxoaFcE EXeAZPJeL/8gS6 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:49:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54944 Archived-At: > 9943@debbugs.gnu.org for adding to the bug report, This works only if the bug hasn't been archived yet, I presume. > control@debbugs.gnu.org to unarchive. Does this want a subject line? The body would be unarchive 9943 then. Or is reopen 9943 better? > It's all in > admin/notes/bugtracker. I'll read that now. Thanks, martin