From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10186: 23.3; save-some-buffers not making review windows large enough Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:56:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4ED8D8F1.9070307@gmx.at> References: <4ED892A1.9010109@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322834946 28440 80.91.229.12 (2 Dec 2011 14:09:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10186@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dave Abrahams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 02 15:09:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTnK-0007pz-0W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:08:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41131 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTcQ-00012H-NB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTcH-0000w3-4f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTbw-00006K-Px for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:24 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTbw-0008WE-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTbq-0006Ea-7c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10186 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10186-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10186.132283421023940 (code B ref 10186); Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10186) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2011 13:56:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTbO-0006Dl-Ql for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:56:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWTbF-0006DI-L8 for 10186@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:56:28 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Dec 2011 13:56:01 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-54-252.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.54.252]) [62.47.54.252] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 02 Dec 2011 14:56:01 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19TQz99RIZTEzeHc+Dp6bSKgOhytG1kd41jQdvHOp ZE4UWHNzme6Df6 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54611 Archived-At: >> The window has the size provided by `display-buffer'. What are your >> values of `split-height-threshold' and `split-width-threshold'? > > nil This means that you get a two-windows frame and your window is still too small? In this case I would suggest popping up a frame instead. > and 160, respectively. >> Setting `enable-recursive-minibuffers' to a non-nil value should allow >> to do that. > > I've always been leery of doing that, just because I figured it's > disabled-by-default for a reason, but I will try it. That said, doing > something that's considered "unsafe for novices" shouldn't be required > in order to make something so basic as save-some-buffers work, should > it? Doesn't C-M-v work with the default `display-buffer' approach? martin