From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10186: 23.3; save-some-buffers not making review windows large enough Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:56:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4ED892A1.9010109@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322816219 23007 80.91.229.12 (2 Dec 2011 08:56:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10186@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dave Abrahams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 02 09:56:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWOvO-0000nU-A1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:56:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47438 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWOvN-00053q-PT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:56:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWOvK-00053l-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:56:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWOvJ-0002wF-C5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:56:50 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWOvJ-0002wA-76 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:56:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWOvW-00043E-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10186 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10186-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10186.132281618115522 (code B ref 10186); Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10186) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2011 08:56:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWOur-00042J-2w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:56:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWOuo-000428-6U for 10186@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:56:19 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Dec 2011 08:56:02 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-59-113.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.59.113]) [62.47.59.113] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 02 Dec 2011 09:56:02 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/spvUiaczsCn3SxmjXSuP4WIGPZ3xLkLYTsn9WwS FxjZmSLW9Rh/nI User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:57:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54596 Archived-At: > `M-x save-some-buffers' offers to let me review my files (or their > diffs) before saving them with, but very often the window I'm given in > which to do the review is pitifully small and really inadequate. The window has the size provided by `display-buffer'. What are your values of `split-height-threshold' and `split-width-threshold'? > Not > only that, but there's basically no way (at least none that I can find) > to scroll the window and reveal useful information. Setting `enable-recursive-minibuffers' to a non-nil value should allow to do that. martin