From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9831: cause of bug found! [PATCH] Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:52:53 +0200 Message-ID: <4EA929F5.2080005@gmx.at> References: <4EA3DC2F.9040303@gmx.at> <4EA5308F.2050608@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319709208 16121 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2011 09:53:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9831@debbugs.gnu.org, jpff@codemist.co.uk To: mark.lillibridge@hp.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 11:53:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJMeF-00084E-L5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:53:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59269 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJMeF-00041N-9F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJMeC-000412-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJMeA-0002RG-BD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJMeA-0002RC-6a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:53:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJMft-0002Fa-N7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9831 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9831-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9831.13197092918623 (code B ref 9831); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9831) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2011 09:54:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJMfj-0002F1-BZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJMfg-0002Eo-P8 for 9831@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:54:49 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2011 09:52:54 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-54-146.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.54.146]) [62.47.54.146] by mail.gmx.net (mp050) with SMTP; 27 Oct 2011 11:52:54 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+NoEAxzXqN/A/d2sIKV2cTQKUSi72YN0+Q/0CZv+ vxy1H7XYLT2gj0 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 05:55:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53195 Archived-At: > Yes, 'o' calls rmail-output from an Rmail buffer and > rmail-summary-output from the associated summary buffer. Both suffer > from the bug we are talking about. Aha. > What John means by "changes to that buffer" is that his window > showing rmail-buffer A changes to a *different* rmail-buffer, namely the > one he was outputting the message to. Note that this buffer change does > not occur when the targeted rmail file is not held in a buffer, hence > John's comments about inconsistency. OK. I believe you now. > Let's ask John if my patch makes his bug go away. It certainly > makes mine go way. Good idea. Thanks, martin