From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9350: 23.3; File menu should contain "split window horizontally C-x 3" Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:46:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4EA177A0.2060003@gmx.at> References: <87wre4z0zw.wl%arne_bab@web.de> <4E9C29BB.4020804@gmx.at> <4E9C79E5.9010901@gmx.at> <4EA13C0C.2090202@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319204822 1526 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2011 13:47:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9350@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 21 15:46:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RHFR2-0003T1-Uu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:46:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33863 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHFR2-0007xQ-Gg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHFQu-0007x9-UE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:46:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHFQt-0002tT-QP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHFQt-0002tM-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RHFS5-0005pR-M2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9350 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9350-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9350.131920485322364 (code B ref 9350); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9350) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2011 13:47:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RHFRd-0005oe-2p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:47:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RHFRa-0005oP-Bs for 9350@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2011 13:46:09 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-42-120.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.42.120]) [62.47.42.120] by mail.gmx.net (mp068) with SMTP; 21 Oct 2011 15:46:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+kvJ9LtPikvIxvgYUqG3MxA78Rb2h6IWCxqes4wq 9fgKNJY3PhjdJj User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:48:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52985 Archived-At: >>> PS: One thing that annoys me in the current working of split-window: it >>> doesn't let you say which window (the top or the bottom) is the new one. >> The new one is that returned by `split-window', as before. > > No, that's not the issue. It's not about "which window (the > selected-window or the returned window) is the new one" it's "which > window (the top one or the bottom one)". > > And the issue is not "tell me which it is" but "I want to control which > one it should be". Sorry. I'm missing you here. > No, here's the scenario: you have a dedicated window, and you want to > create a new window above that one: split-window won't work because it > will always create the new window below. Do you mean that (let (new) (set-window-dedicated-p (selected-window) t) (setq new (split-window nil nil 'above)) (set-window-buffer new "*Messages*")) doesn't do that? martin