From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9639: 24.0.90; Problem with bury-buffer in minibuffer-hide-completions Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:50:34 +0200 Message-ID: <4E8B2B4A.2080809@gmx.at> References: <87hb3thebv.fsf@escher.home> <4E86D879.7060105@gmx.at> <87r52xkp0l.fsf@escher.home> <4E86F22B.5060007@gmx.at> <4E874831.3060709@gmx.at> <4E883869.7070309@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317743503 816 80.91.229.12 (4 Oct 2011 15:51:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9639@debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 17:51:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HO-0001ni-0x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:51:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46143 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HN-0003dy-BR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:51:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48669) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HK-0003dk-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HJ-0005oc-9P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:51:34 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58220) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HJ-0005oY-7o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:51:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7Ij-0001vZ-PS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9639.13177435297321 (code B ref 9639); Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2011 15:52:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7Hs-0001u1-GU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7Hq-0001ts-H3 for 9639@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Oct 2011 15:50:35 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-57-203.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.57.203]) [62.47.57.203] by mail.gmx.net (mp051) with SMTP; 04 Oct 2011 17:50:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Txkl35tfTBosCVh7mht5JyqALIe5lia1gfemAri q3u0v/c6zbp6jt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:53:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52162 Archived-At: > No. Either both are deleted or both are iconified, since (again) it is > mostly a choice that depends on the general window-manager usage and > user preference. > >> Basically, it would be nice to get rid of either `bury-buffer' or >> `quit-window'. Having two functions do approximately the same thing is >> neither reasonable for developers nor for users. > > I think both are in fairly wide use, so getting rid of one of them is > not really an option. But I hope we can define one in terms of > the other (or both in terms of a third internal one). I now try to handle burying buffers via `quit-window' and `bury-buffer' in a uniform manner. All this in a new function called `window--delete' (which is also called by `replace-buffer-in-windows' although the latter always deletes the frame if possible). martin