From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9639: 24.0.90; Problem with bury-buffer in minibuffer-hide-completions Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:57:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4E86F22B.5060007@gmx.at> References: <87hb3thebv.fsf@escher.home> <4E86D879.7060105@gmx.at> <87r52xkp0l.fsf@escher.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317466741 5284 80.91.229.12 (1 Oct 2011 10:59:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 10:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9639@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 01 12:58:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9xHV-0005ZC-Bn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:58:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9xHU-0007mQ-Om for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:58:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9xHR-0007m8-Qh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:58:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9xHQ-0005w5-OD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:58:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9xHQ-0005w1-L2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:58:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9xIZ-0002Cf-7n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:00:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9639.13174667458361 (code B ref 9639); Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2011 10:59:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9xHc-0002Ao-PW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R9xHZ-0002AN-Mo for 9639@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 06:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Oct 2011 10:57:48 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-56-209.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.56.209]) [62.47.56.209] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 01 Oct 2011 12:57:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/B7Wp0+7DBhVT34WDSHDNKk8XXfqwtUkUGagcYXt fJFWb0Pxmq5ykd User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <87r52xkp0l.fsf@escher.home> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 07:00:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52036 Archived-At: > I confirm this DTRT for my case. I believe the original idea was to mark the window as dedicated but `display-buffer-mark-dedicated' is currently not handled by the new buffer display routines. None of them calls `window--display-buffer-2' with the DEDICATED argument set. OTOH in the discussion of bug#7368 it was said that dedicating the completions window might harm its reuse by other `display-buffer' calls so I leave this to Stefan to decide what shall be done. martin