From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonathan Ganc Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9356: `event-modifiers' documentation Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:46:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4E549021.50203@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314170594 21986 80.91.229.12 (24 Aug 2011 07:23:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:23:14 +0000 (UTC) To: 9356@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 24 09:23:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw7np-0006Wu-D9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:23:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44722 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw7no-0007iH-TB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw7lI-0007Cr-59 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:20:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw7lH-00074b-0K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:20:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw7lG-00074V-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:20:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw7ni-0005Zg-6X; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jonathan Ganc Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 9356 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.131417055221388 (code B ref -1); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 07:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2011 07:22:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw7nD-0005Yu-4r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:22:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw6Ke-0007mp-4v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw6IB-0003Sx-Oc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:46:24 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:56071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw6IB-0003St-KU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:46:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw6IA-0000OG-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:46:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw6I9-0003Sj-IQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:46:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:47221) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw6I9-0003Sb-Ft for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:46:21 -0400 Original-Received: by yib2 with SMTP id 2so672509yib.0 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:46:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+bE5D04gnEfjAvJ5qx87rWsTZjZXKMRoN09rB+MzCHw=; b=BvPV+rttLgFsSLC247MfopNpuBtS0AvDWWa5sO+VfRklDw8bDG5+0VontYtxdJ2tHA LLMhizVnQ7LC5q4R6OcvFHOjlxx7SDqK3ArIfRZ5Ug3KunQbgcwIGE8bHdy2VjRWMxhp 3S6Kc5hbNHrr7wRbwFmy5v9GmtPWqEYeeTb2U= Original-Received: by 10.150.177.20 with SMTP id z20mr882241ybe.446.1314164778693; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.197] (cpe-66-68-105-244.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.105.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a29sm1101131yhj.3.2011.08.23.22.46.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:46:18 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:22:30 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:23:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:23:06 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50265 Archived-At: The documentation for `event-modifiers' states: "If EVENT is a symbol that has never been used in an event that has been read as input in the current Emacs session, then this function can return nil, even when EVENT actually has modifiers." However, looking in the `event-modifier' definition, the function `internal-event-symbol-parse-modifiers' seems to deal with this (potential) issue. Can someone give me an example where `event-modifier' would inappropriately return nil? Thanks, Jonathan __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 6404 (20110823) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com