On 7/6/11 10:49 AM, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > David Caldwell writes: > >>>>> If I have many buffers open (284 at the moment) and if I run >>>>> dabbrev-expand (M-/) to expand the word under my buffers then it >>>>> searches through every buffer and takes an understandably long >>>>> time. If I mispelled the word fragment then it never has a hope of >>>>> finding it and I'd like to cancel the operation. But C-g does not work >>>>> for some reason and so I have to wait a good 5 to 10 seconds for it to >>>>> finish scanning all my buffers. This gets very frustrating after the >>>>> third or fourth time. > > [...] > >> After further testing, I believe this is not really a bug in dabbrev. >> C-g *does* cancel the operation, it's just that sometimes there is a >> large lag before it cancels (though in my current tests I've never had >> it go beyond 2 seconds). I have a ton of buffers open right this moment >> and fulling scan them takes 15 to 20 seconds, so I can definitely tell >> that it's canceling. >> >> The 1 to 2 second lag is still a little frustrating, but it's much >> better than the originally reported 5 to 10 second lag. I wonder if it >> has to do with how the Mac handles the quit signal in windowed mode... > > Do you know if this bug is still present in newer Emacs versions? It's hard to tell--currently, it seems that scanning through all the buffers is *really* fast. So it only takes about a second to scan through my 600 buffers even if I don't cancel it. It doesn't really seem like canceling makes the process any faster but my level of annoyance is gone because of the search speedup. I'm running a version built from bzr on 2011-06-09. -David